Smart Insect Trap With Selective Killing and Beneficial Insect Release

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing insect traps and insecticide delivery systems fail to selectively target and kill harmful insects like Asian Hornets while sparing non-targeted, beneficial insects, often leading to unnecessary harm and contamination of non-target species.

Innovation Solution

A smart insect trap equipped with a selective killing mechanism that identifies trapped insects using machine vision and a shredding device, allowing targeted insects to be killed and non-targeted insects to be released unharmed, utilizing a moveable element and shredding device within an enclosure to differentiate and manage insect fate based on identification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If traditional insect traps are used to trap insects for killing, then harmful insects can be captured, but non-targeted beneficial insects are also trapped and killed unnecessarily

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveharmful insect controlVSAvoidcollateral harm to beneficial insects
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The trap divides the killing function into segments: only insects that pass through the identification means and trigger the selective killing mechanism are killed, while others are released. This segmentation allows differentiation between target and non-target insects, resolving the contradiction by preventing collateral harm to beneficial species.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical trapping (where all trapped insects are killed) with an automated identification and selective killing system using cameras, processors, and controlled shredding mechanisms. This substitution enables precise targeting of harmful insects while sparing beneficial ones, eliminating unnecessary collateral harm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If insecticide delivery systems are used to control flying insects, then pest populations can be reduced, but the systems cannot target only specific insects and may harm useful insects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepest population controlVSAvoidnon-selective insecticide effect
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The trap uses self-service mechanisms where the identification means automatically detects and identifies trapped insects, and the selective killing mechanism autonomously decides whether to kill or release based on the identification results. This self-service approach eliminates the need for manual intervention and ensures precise, non-selective pest control without harming beneficial insects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback loops where the identification means continuously monitors trapped insects and provides information to the selective killing mechanism, which adjusts its action accordingly. This feedback ensures that only confirmed harmful insects are killed, while beneficial insects are released, resolving the non-selectivity issue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If anaesthetic product is injected into hornet nest to anesthetise insects before destruction, then insects can be controlled, but there is risk for the person doing the injection and insects may escape before being anesthetised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsect control reliabilityVSAvoidinjection risk and escape risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary approach by using a trap as a safe intermediary zone between the operator and the hornets. Instead of directly injecting anaesthetic into the nest (which carries risk), the trap lures hornets inside and provides a controlled environment where they are identified and dealt with safely, eliminating injection risks and escape risks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The trap performs preliminary actions by first luring hornets into the enclosure before any killing or release action is taken. This preliminary trapping phase allows the system to safely contain the insects and then proceed with identification and selective dealing, eliminating the risks associated with direct injection and preventing escape during the process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP4663015A1A smart insect trap and a method for using such a smart insect trap
Publication Date: 2025.12.17 STRYGOO BV
  • EP4663015A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4663015A1 patent drawingFigure 2~4
  • EP4663015A1 patent drawingFigure 5A~5C

AI summary

There is described an insect trap (1) for trapping and selectively killing or releasing insects. The insect trap comprising a selective killing mechanism (40). The selective killing mechanism (40) comprising a moveable element (45) moveably placed inside an enclosure (41). The selective killing mechanism (40) further comprising a shredding device (48) positioned at least partly inside the enclosure (41), the shredding device (48) being configured to cooperate with the moveable element (45) to selectively kill an insect located inside the containment space (46) based on the identification by the identification means (30).