Smart Metamaterial Elements for Stimuli-Responsive Wave Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing artificially-structured materials lack the ability to dynamically change their properties in response to stimuli, limiting their adaptability and functionality in processing various types of energy waves.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating an array of elements with integrated tuning mechanisms and sensors, which allow for the adjustment of operational parameters on a per-element basis in response to detected stimuli, enabling the material to change its properties and process energy waves effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If artificially-structured materials use fixed structural elements, then manufacturing is simpler and structure is more stable, but the material cannot dynamically change properties in response to stimuli

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic property change capabilityVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the Dynamics principle by incorporating tuning mechanisms that enable each structural element to dynamically adjust its operational parameters (such as resonant frequency, position, or orientation) in response to detected stimuli. This transforms the static metamaterial structure into a dynamic system where elements can adapt their properties independently or collectively based on environmental conditions, thereby achieving property reconfigurability without fundamentally redesigning the entire material architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent divides the artificially-structured material into discrete, independently controllable elements arranged in arrays or lattices. Each element can be individually tuned through its own tuning mechanism, allowing localized property changes. This segmentation enables complex global behavior to emerge from simple local adjustments, resolving the contradiction by making adaptability achievable through modular, incremental changes rather than requiring complete system redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If tuning mechanisms are added to each element, then material properties can be changed dynamically, but the device complexity and manufacturing difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproperty reconfigurabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs universal tuning mechanisms that can be integrated across multiple element types using common design principles and fabrication techniques. The tuning mechanisms serve multiple functions: they adjust operational parameters, sense environmental stimuli, and can be controlled through unified control systems. This multi-functionality reduces manufacturing complexity by standardizing components rather than requiring custom solutions for each element type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The tuning mechanisms are integrated within or alongside the structural elements themselves, with sensors embedded in or near the elements they control. This nesting approach minimizes additional space requirements and reduces the number of separate components that would need to be assembled, thereby easing manufacturing while still achieving full property reconfigurability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Adaptability or versatility

If sensors are integrated into the array, then the material can detect stimuli and respond dynamically, but the device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestimuli response capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by enabling each element or sensor to autonomously detect local environmental stimuli and trigger appropriate tuning responses without requiring complex external control systems. The sensors are directly coupled to their corresponding tuning mechanisms, creating self-contained control loops that reduce overall system complexity. This decentralized autonomy allows the material to respond adaptively to stimuli while minimizing the need for centralized processing and control infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20240085623A1Artificially-structured materials with smart elements
Publication Date: 2024.03.14 METAVC PATENT HOLDING CO
  • US20240085623A1 patent drawing
  • US20240085623A1 patent drawing
  • US20240085623A1 patent drawing

AI summary

According to various embodiments, an array of elements forms an artificially-structured material. The artificially-structured material can also include an array of tuning mechanisms included as part of the array of elements that are configured to change material properties of the artificially-structured material on a per-element basis. The tuning mechanisms can change the material properties of the artificially-structured material by changing operational properties of the elements in the array of elements on a per-element basis based on one or a combination of stimuli detected by sensors included in the array of tuning mechanisms, programmable circuit modules included as part of the array of tuning mechanisms, data stored at individual data stores included as part of the array of tuning mechanisms, and communications transmitted through interconnects included as part of the array of elements.