Smart Meter Anomaly Monitoring With Dynamic Shared Thresholds

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Smart meters struggle to detect anomalies such as leaks or fraud efficiently without increasing complexity or data exchange volume, which is critical for battery-powered meters with long lifespans like water or gas meters.

Innovation Solution

A monitoring method where each meter acquires primary measurements and selects pertinent ones based on specific criteria, transmitting these to a remote processor device for centralized analysis and dynamic threshold adjustment, minimizing data exchange and maintaining meter simplicity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If meters perform comprehensive anomaly detection locally, then detection accuracy improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection accuracyVSAvoidmeter complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides anomaly detection functionality into two segments: meters perform local pre-processing and selection of pertinent measurements, while the remote processor performs comprehensive anomaly detection and threshold adjustment. This segmentation allows accurate detection without requiring full detection capability in each meter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The remote processor acts as an intermediary that receives pertinent measurements from meters and performs the complex anomaly detection algorithms. This intermediary handles the computational complexity centrally while meters remain simple data collection points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If meters transmit all primary measurements to the remote processor, then detection accuracy improves, but data exchange volume increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection accuracyVSAvoiddata exchange volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the pertinent measurements from the complete set of primary measurements before transmission. Each meter applies selection criteria to identify and transmit only those measurements that are relevant for anomaly detection, filtering out redundant data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Meters perform preliminary processing and selection of measurements before transmission. By pre-selecting pertinent measurements at the source, the system reduces the data volume that needs to be transmitted while ensuring that the most relevant information is available for anomaly detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If detection threshold is adjusted dynamically in each meter, then detection adaptability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection adaptabilityVSAvoidmeter complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of having each meter independently adjust detection thresholds, the system inverts the approach by having the remote processor determine and manage thresholds based on aggregate data from all meters. This centralizes the adaptability logic where it can benefit from all available information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The remote processor serves multiple functions: collecting data from all meters, performing anomaly detection, dynamically adjusting thresholds, and managing the entire monitoring system. This multi-functionality consolidates complexity in a single device rather than distributing it across many meters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Measurement precision

If meters perform extensive data processing locally, then detection accuracy improves, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection accuracyVSAvoidmeter energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Meters perform only partial processing locally by selecting pertinent measurements rather than transmitting or processing all data. This partial action at the meter level is sufficient to reduce data volume while the remote processor performs the remaining processing needed for accurate anomaly detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12085419B2Monitoring method for monitoring a set of meters
Publication Date: 2024.09.10 SAGEMCOM ENERGY & TELECOM SAS
  • US12085419B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of monitoring a set of meters that are connected to a common remote processor device, the method comprising both first steps performed in each meter for: acquiring primary measurements of a magnitude representative of the occurrence of an anomaly; selecting pertinent measurements from the primary measurements, the pertinent measurements satisfying a pertinence criterion; regularly transmitting the pertinent measurements to the remote processor device; and second steps performed in the remote processor device, for: comparing, for each meter, the pertinent measurements with a detection threshold common to all of the meters of the set of meters in order to attempt detecting an anomaly associated with said meter; and adjusting the detection threshold dynamically as a function of the percentage of meters detected as being associated with an anomaly.