Smart Pedal Control for Overlapping Brake and Accelerator Signals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle control systems fail to safely manage overlapping brake and accelerator pedal signals for extended periods, particularly in vehicles with mechanical throttle control, limiting engine RPM to idle and not effectively addressing various driving scenarios, and are not applicable to vehicles with mechanical throttle bodies.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that determine overlapping brake and accelerator pedal signals for predetermined times, implementing smart pedal control modes to limit engine RPM or torque, allowing for safe vehicle operation by adjusting engine output based on actual engine states and pedal signal variations, applicable to both electronic and mechanical throttle systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the ECU limits engine RPM to idle RPM when accelerator and brake pedal signals overlap, then vehicle safety is improved, but the control system cannot cope with various driving situations and cannot be applied to mechanical throttle control vehicles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle safetyVSAvoidapplicability to different throttle control systems
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal smart pedal control method that works with both electronic throttle control (ETC) and mechanical throttle control systems. The controller adapts its behavior based on the throttle control type detected, applying RPM limiting for ETC vehicles and torque/acceleration limiting for mechanical throttle vehicles, thereby achieving multi-functionality across different vehicle architectures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes control parameters based on the detected throttle control type. For ETC vehicles, it limits engine RPM to idle RPM. For mechanical throttle vehicles, it limits engine torque to a predetermined value and restricts accelerator pedal operation. This parameter adaptation enables the same control logic to serve multiple vehicle types

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If the ECU applies simple RPM limiting control when pedal signals overlap, then implementation is simplified, but the system fails to address various driving scenarios including mechanical throttle vehicles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol implementation complexityVSAvoidcoverage of driving scenarios
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic control strategies that adapt to different vehicle types and driving conditions. The controller dynamically selects between RPM limiting mode (for ETC vehicles) and torque/acceleration limiting mode (for mechanical throttle vehicles) based on the detected throttle control type, enabling the system to handle various driving scenarios without requiring separate control systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If the system detects overlapping pedal signals and limits engine output, then dangerous acceleration is prevented, but the control system is not applicable to vehicles with mechanical throttle bodies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety during signal overlapVSAvoidcompatibility with mechanical throttle systems
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the control parameter from RPM limiting (effective for ETC) to torque and accelerator pedal operation limiting (effective for mechanical throttle). When a mechanical throttle vehicle is detected, the controller limits engine torque to a predetermined value and restricts the accelerator pedal operation amount, ensuring safety during signal overlap while maintaining compatibility with mechanical throttle systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary detection mechanism that identifies the throttle control type (ETC or mechanical) and mediates the selection of appropriate control strategies. This intermediary function allows the system to bridge between different throttle control architectures and apply the correct safety measures for each type

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS9377104B2Method and system for controlling driving of vehicle
Publication Date: 2016.06.28 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US9377104B2 patent drawing
  • US9377104B2 patent drawing
  • US9377104B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of controlling driving of a vehicle may include determining whether a vehicle speed exceeds a predetermined speed, determining whether a signal of an accelerator position sensor (APS) is input as a signal of an accelerator pedal, determining whether a signal of a brake position sensor (BPS) is input as a signal of a brake pedal, determining whether the signal of the BPS is input while overlapping the signal of the APS for over a predetermined time in a state where the signal of the APS is being input, determining whether the signal of the APS is input while overlapping the signal of the BPS for over a predetermined time in a state where the signal of the BPS is first being input, driving an engine in a first smart pedal control mode, and executing a second smart pedal control mode.