Smart Remote Control Unit with Sensor-Based Context Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional remote-control units in educational settings require manual configuration and explicit user input to control multiple devices, leading to inefficiencies and distractions for teachers managing classrooms with various computing and output devices.

Innovation Solution

A smart remote-control unit equipped with sensors such as motion, pressure, and vision sensors that adapt to the physical environment by determining user attributes and use modes, allowing automatic control of devices based on detected interactions without explicit user specification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a simple control device like a traditional remote control is used, then the device is easy to operate, but the control functionality is limited and fixed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidcontrol functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The remote control unit dynamically adapts its control functionality based on detected environmental context, user attributes, and device states. The system transitions from static, pre-programmed control to dynamic, context-aware control where available functions and interfaces change automatically based on real-time conditions, resolving the contradiction between simplicity and versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters by detecting user attributes (through sensors, biometrics, or profile data) and environmental conditions, then automatically adjusting control behavior, available functions, and user interface presentation. This allows the same physical device to provide different levels of complexity and functionality based on current parameters, maintaining ease of operation while expanding adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If a complex control device like a cellphone or tablet is used, then advanced control approaches are available, but the device is intrusive and requires manual configuration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol functionalityVSAvoidmanual configuration requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The remote control unit performs self-configuration by automatically detecting environmental conditions, identifying available devices, and adapting its control capabilities without requiring manual setup by the user. The system services itself by gathering context information through sensors and automatically configuring appropriate control functions, eliminating the need for manual configuration while maintaining advanced control capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-detecting environmental context and user attributes before control operations are needed. By gathering information about the physical environment, available devices, and user characteristics in advance, the system prepares appropriate control configurations automatically, so when the user needs to control devices, everything is already configured and ready for immediate use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If manual control configuration is required, then control precision can be maintained, but response time increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously gathers feedback from sensors about environmental conditions, device states, and user attributes, then uses this feedback to automatically adjust control configurations in real-time. This closed-loop feedback mechanism allows the system to maintain precise control by adapting to current conditions without requiring manual reconfiguration, thereby improving response time and productivity while preserving control precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240281078A1Automatic remote control of computer devices in a physical room
Publication Date: 2024.08.22 PROMETHEAN
  • US20240281078A1 patent drawing
  • US20240281078A1 patent drawing
  • US20240281078A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of managing human-computer interaction using a remote-control unit (RCU) is disclosed. A processor within the RCU receives sensor data from a plurality of sensors within the RCU. The processor determines attributes of the RCU based on the sensor data, the attributes including at least a first user of the RCU and a position and orientation of the RCU in a physical room. The processor determines a use mode of the RCU based on the attributes. The use mode is mapped to a set of actions to be performed on a set of input/output (I/O) devices. Each action is mapped to one or more interactions with the RCU. Responsive to the processor detecting a user interaction with the RCU that is mapped to an action in the set of actions, the processor causes the action to be performed on one or more I/O devices.