Smart Security Inspection System with Risk-Based Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing security inspection systems in public places face challenges such as high labor costs, low efficiency, disordered passenger and baggage management, and lack of differentiated security inspections based on pre-stored risk information.

Innovation Solution

A smart security inspection system that integrates a server, information input unit, baggage unpacking unit, security inspection unit, and centralized data processing unit, allowing for differentiated security inspections of passengers and their baggage based on pre-stored risk information, and reducing labor costs through automated processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If security inspection is performed manually with coordination of security inspectors, then inspection can be conducted, but labor cost is high and overall efficiency is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity inspection efficiencyVSAvoidsystem integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The security inspection system is divided into multiple functional modules: information input unit for passenger data collection, baggage unpacking unit for luggage processing, security inspection unit for actual inspection, and centralized data processing unit for result analysis. Each module operates semi-independently, allowing parallel processing of multiple passengers while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Passenger information is collected and risk assessment is performed in advance before the actual security inspection. The centralized data processing unit pre-processes passenger data, baggage information, and risk factors, so that when inspection occurs, the system already has prepared assessment results, eliminating the need for manual coordination and reducing inspection time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If simple integration of security inspection devices is used, then device complexity is reduced, but differentiated security inspection based on risk information cannot be performed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedifferentiated inspection capabilityVSAvoidsystem integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different inspection levels to different passengers based on their individual risk profiles. The centralized data processing unit analyzes passenger-specific information and generates customized inspection plans, allowing high-risk passengers to undergo more thorough inspection while low-risk passengers receive expedited processing, optimizing resource allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The centralized data processing unit serves multiple functions: it collects passenger information, assesses risk levels, generates inspection plans, and coordinates with all inspection units. This multi-functional design allows the system to adapt to different inspection scenarios without requiring separate specialized systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If security inspection processes are manual and unautomated, then system complexity is low, but labor cost is high and management order is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassenger management orderVSAvoidinspection process automation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously collects data from various units and provides real-time feedback to adjust inspection processes. The centralized data processing unit monitors passenger flow, inspection status, and risk assessments, automatically adjusting resource allocation and inspection priorities to maintain orderly processing while reducing manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Passengers interact with the system through automated information input units that collect their data and guide them through the inspection process. The system automatically manages baggage tracking, inspection scheduling, and result notification, reducing the need for manual staff intervention while maintaining clear procedural guidance for passengers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP3754576B1Smart security inspection system and method
Publication Date: 2025.02.12 NUCTECH CO LTD
  • EP3754576B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3754576B1 patent drawingFigure 2~4
  • EP3754576B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

The disclosure discloses a smart security inspection system and method. The method comprises: distributing, by the system, a security inspection tray to a person to be inspected through an unpacking station (31), and binding information of the person to be inspected to the baggage identifier; identifying the baggage identifier, obtaining the information of the person to be inspected according to the baggage identifier, obtaining pre-stored risk information according to the information of the person to be inspected, performing differentiated security inspections on the person to be inspected and/or baggage according to the risk information, and binding the obtained data to the information of the person to be inspected; packing the baggage and finishing the security inspection.