Smart Service Door Access Control for Secure Storage Receptacles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing storage receptacles, such as drop boxes and mailboxes, are vulnerable to unauthorized access, leading to theft and identity fraud due to their design, which lacks effective access control and security measures, especially when housed in hard materials like brick or concrete.

Innovation Solution

A locking device apparatus that can be retrofitted or integrated into storage receptacles, featuring a smart technology-powered service door with a spring-loaded hatch and RFID access control, providing secure access and notification to authorized users while being tamper-proof and resistant to unauthorized entry.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the service door is locked to prevent unauthorized access, then security is improved, but authorized users cannot freely and securely gain access

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidaccess control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical locking systems with electronic access control mechanisms including keypads, RFID readers, and biometric scanners. This substitution allows authorized users to access the service door through electronic authentication while maintaining security, resolving the contradiction between locked access and authorized entry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an electronic control system as an intermediary between the user and the service door. This intermediary layer processes authentication credentials and controls door access accordingly, enabling both security enforcement and authorized access without requiring physical keys or manual locking mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If traditional locking mechanisms are used on the service door, then unauthorized access is reduced, but the system becomes vulnerable to tampering and prying

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanti-tamper securityVSAvoidsecurity system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces vulnerable mechanical locking mechanisms with electronic access control systems that are integrated into the service door assembly. This substitution eliminates traditional locks that can be picked or bypassed, while the electronic system provides tamper detection and resistance capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent integrates multiple security features within the service door assembly, nesting electronic components, sensors, and control mechanisms within the door structure itself. This nested design consolidates security functions into a unified system that is more resistant to tampering while managing complexity through integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Reliability

If access control features are added to the service door, then security is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess controlVSAvoidservice door assembly
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs the service door assembly to perform multiple functions: it serves as both the physical barrier and the access control interface. The door integrates authentication mechanisms, display screens, keypads, and notification systems into a single multi-functional unit, reducing the need for separate components and managing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple access control features including keypads, RFID readers, biometric scanners, and notification systems into a single integrated service door assembly. This merging of functions into one unified structure manages complexity through consolidation while providing comprehensive access control capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Strength

If the receptacle is made from hard materials like brick or concrete, then durability is improved, but unauthorized access through the structure remains a risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural durabilityVSAvoidunauthorized access
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces reliance on physical material strength alone with electronic access control systems integrated into the service door. This substitution addresses the vulnerability of hard materials to drilling, cutting, or other physical breaching methods by implementing electronic authentication and monitoring capabilities that detect and prevent unauthorized access attempts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces electronic monitoring and control systems as intermediaries between potential intruders and the receptacle structure. These systems include sensors, alarms, and access control mechanisms that detect tampering attempts and prevent unauthorized access, complementing the structural durability of hard materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances security by controlling access to storage receptacles, reducing theft and fraud by ensuring only authorized individuals can access the internal compartment, even when the receptacles are housed in durable materials, and provides a reliable power source through solar cells and batteries.

Implementation Method 1

provides a reliable power source through solar cells and batteries

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolar energy conversion: Photovoltaic Effect

Implementation Method 2

provides a reliable power source through solar cells and batteries

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical energy storage: Battery (electricity)

Implementation Method 3

featuring a smart technology-powered service door with a spring-loaded hatch

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring mechanism: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS10143319B1Method and apparatus for securing and controlling access to the storage receptacles
Publication Date: 2018.12.04 NICHOLS JASYL ARLYN
  • US10143319B1 patent drawing
  • US10143319B1 patent drawing
  • US10143319B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A storage receptacle securing apparatus for controlling access to a storage compartment includes a housing that creates an internal compartment, where a hole extending through the housing provides access to the storage compartment of an attached storage receptacle. A sealing panel positioned inside the internal compartment is capable of sealing the hole extending through the housing such that access to the storage compartment of the storage receptacle is prevented. The apparatus is electronically powered by a remote user device in communication with an onboard electronic locking device such that the sealing panel opens to provide access to the storage compartment only when prompted to open by an authorized user device.