Smart Switch Resource Management for Voltage Sag Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional resource management systems face challenges in cost-effectively managing power supply for small-to-medium sized plants, particularly in preventing equipment failures due to dynamic load transitions and natural phenomena like voltage sags, and struggle to efficiently manage multiple equipment loads.

Innovation Solution

A resource management system comprising smart switches, a grid manager, and a service manager that dynamically control and reroute power supply based on real-time monitoring and policies, allowing for autonomous and cooperative switching between power sources to maintain continuous power delivery, even during events like voltage sags.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If duplexing of power supply path and backup power supply are implemented, then reliability of power supply is improved, but cost and installation space increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower supply reliabilityVSAvoidpower supply system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides power supply management into multiple independent smart switches, each capable of autonomous decision-making. Each smart switch monitors its own connected equipment and independently switches power sources when needed, eliminating the need for centralized complex backup systems while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Smart switches are equipped with monitoring parts and policy storage that enable them to autonomously detect power quality issues and execute switching decisions without external intervention. The system self-manages power supply reliability through local intelligence rather than requiring complex centralized backup infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Device complexity

If UPS is installed based on averaged operation analysis, then cost and space are reduced, but ability to respond to dynamic load transitions and failures is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower supply system complexityVSAvoidresponse to dynamic load transitions
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static averaged operation analysis to dynamic real-time monitoring. Smart switches continuously monitor power quality parameters and load conditions, enabling adaptive response to changing operational conditions rather than relying on pre-calculated average values.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring parts in smart switches provide real-time feedback on power quality and load status. This feedback loop enables the system to dynamically adjust power supply decisions based on actual conditions, improving adaptability to load transitions and failures compared to static analysis approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If manual power supply switching is performed based on thunder forecast, then cost is reduced, but reliability and response time to instantaneous voltage drops are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower supply system complexityVSAvoidprotection against instantaneous voltage drop
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-configuring switching policies in the smart switches before failures occur. When voltage sags or failures are detected, the pre-programmed policies enable immediate automated switching without waiting for manual intervention or external forecasts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical switching operations with automated electronic control. Smart switches use electronic monitoring and control mechanisms to automatically detect power quality issues and execute switching, eliminating the delays and human error inherent in manual switching based on forecasts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Device complexity

If conventional power supply management is used, then installation cost is reduced, but ability to manage multiple equipment loads dynamically is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower supply system complexityVSAvoidequipment management efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Smart switches are designed as universal devices that can manage multiple different types of equipment loads through standardized interfaces. Each smart switch can connect to and manage various equipment while maintaining consistent monitoring and control functionality, enabling efficient management of diverse equipment without requiring specialized systems for each device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10389174B2Resource management system
Publication Date: 2019.08.20 NAT INST OF INFORMATION & COMM TECH
  • US10389174B2 patent drawing
  • US10389174B2 patent drawing
  • US10389174B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A resource management system includes first and second opening/closing control mechanisms and a grid manager. The first and second control mechanisms each include: a controller to transmit a signal between a resource supply source and a load, a monitor to monitor a state of a resource from the source, a storage to store a policy defining the signal corresponding to the state of the resource from the source; and a path controller to generate the signal based on a monitoring result of the monitor and the policy. The grid manager includes: a third monitor to monitor the state of the resource from the first source; and a third path controller to generate at least one of the first and second signals by controlling at least one of the first path and second path controllers based on a monitoring result of the third monitor.