Smart Tag Prioritization for Object Retrieval

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users face challenges in quickly finding specific objects across multiple devices and cloud storage due to unhelpful file names and lack of effective retrieval mechanisms, especially for non-data objects like pictures and videos.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of smart tags generated based on user events, using metadata and contextual data, with a tagging profile that prioritizes tag creation based on user preferences and behaviors, allowing for efficient and user-specific smart tag generation and storage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If smart tags are generated for all user objects, then object retrieval efficiency is improved, but storage and processing resources are excessively consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject retrieval efficiencyVSAvoidstorage resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by making tag generation selective rather than universal. The system analyzes user behavior patterns and generates tags only for objects that match specific criteria (e.g., objects the user interacts with frequently or objects in specific contexts). This ensures storage resources are consumed only where they provide retrieval value, rather than uniformly across all objects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements partial action by generating tags for only a subset of objects rather than all objects. The tagging priority mechanism determines which objects receive tags based on user preferences and behavior patterns, performing just enough tagging to improve retrieval efficiency without the excessive resource consumption that would result from universal tagging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Productivity

If smart tags are generated for all user objects, then object retrieval efficiency is improved, but processing resources are excessively consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject retrieval efficiencyVSAvoidprocessing resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by concentrating processing resources on generating tags only for high-priority objects identified through user behavior analysis. Instead of uniformly processing all objects, the system selectively applies tagging efforts to objects where users are most likely to benefit from improved retrieval, thereby reducing overall processing resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial action by performing tag generation only for a prioritized subset of objects rather than all objects. The tagging priority mechanism filters objects based on user preferences and behavior patterns, ensuring processing resources are spent only on partial tagging operations that deliver maximum retrieval efficiency improvement with minimum resource expenditure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If user-specific tagging profiles are created, then tag relevance is improved, but device complexity is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetag relevanceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies preliminary action by pre-analyzing user behavior patterns and preferences to create tagging profiles before actual tag generation occurs. This preliminary profiling phase captures user characteristics and object interaction patterns, which then guide subsequent tag generation to ensure high relevance without requiring complex real-time analysis during tagging operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements copying by creating simplified tagging profiles that replicate essential user preferences and behavior patterns. Rather than maintaining complex user models, the system creates condensed profile representations that capture the necessary information for generating relevant tags, thereby achieving high tag relevance with reduced system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS10241988B2Prioritizing smart tag creation
Publication Date: 2019.03.26 LENOVO (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD
  • US10241988B2 patent drawing
  • US10241988B2 patent drawing
  • US10241988B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An aspect provides a method, including: accessing, using a processor, a store of historical user object event information; building, using the processor, a tagging profile based on the store of historical user object event information; determining, using the processor, a new user object event; and determining, using the processor, a priority for tag generation for the new object event using the tagging profile. Other aspects are described and claimed.