Industrial System Models Using SmartObjects and Capability Templates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Industrial system modeling is complicated by the amalgamation of different control types, automated and manual processes, and vendor-specific application specifications, leading to awkward system foundations that constrain end-users in configuring and implementing their industrial systems.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of an object-based system model using SmartObjects, which allows for the representation of industrial assets with internal intelligence, enabling the propagation of changes and supporting multiple capabilities while enforcing relationship rules, thereby allowing end-users greater influence over modeling their industrial systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional system modeling approaches are used to represent industrial systems with multiple vendors and control types, then the system model can cover diverse industrial assets, but the system model becomes awkward and complicated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to represent diverse industrial assets from multiple vendorsVSAvoidcomplexity of system model structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the system model into distinct capability modules, where each capability represents a specific function or process. This segmentation allows diverse industrial assets to be represented through standardized capability interfaces rather than monolithic complex structures, resolving the contradiction between versatility and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements universal capability templates that can represent multiple types of industrial assets and control types through a common framework. This universality allows the system model to accommodate diverse vendors and control types without increasing structural complexity, as the same capability framework applies across different asset types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If the system model includes various combinations of control types and processes from different vendors, then the model can reflect real-world industrial systems, but it constrains end-users in configuring and implementing the system

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of system model representationVSAvoidease of system configuration and implementation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the system model from a rigid structure to a flexible parameter-based configuration system. By defining capabilities through configurable parameters and relationships rather than fixed structures, the model maintains accurate representation of real-world systems while enabling easy user configuration and implementation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces capability templates as intermediary elements between the diverse industrial assets and the system model. These templates act as mediators that standardize the representation of different vendors and control types, maintaining accuracy while simplifying user interaction and system configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of manufacture

If the system model uses fixed structures to represent industrial assets, then the model is easier to implement, but it cannot support customization for different end-user needs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of system model implementationVSAvoidability to customize for different end-user needs
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic capability definitions that allow the system model to adapt its structure based on end-user needs. Rather than fixed structures, capabilities are defined through configurable relationships and parameters that can be customized while maintaining a consistent implementation framework, resolving the contradiction between ease of implementation and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20240078354A1System and methods for modeling capabilities within system models of industrial systems
Publication Date: 2024.03.07 ROCKWELL AUTOMATION TECH INC
  • US20240078354A1 patent drawing
  • US20240078354A1 patent drawing
  • US20240078354A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for modeling capabilities within system models of industrial systems. One system includes an electronic processor configured to receive a request for a system model of an industrial system associated with a set of components. The electronic processor is also configured to access system data associated with the industrial system. The electronic processor is also configured to generate, based on at least the system data, a system model such that the system model includes a set of capabilities associated with the industrial system, wherein each capability included in the set of capabilities is associated with a function of the industrial system. The electronic processor is also configured to enable transmission of the system model for display.