Smartphone Machine Control with Sensor Validation for Reliability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional systems using smartphones for controlling safety-critical machinery lack reliability and security, as smartphones are complex and unsecure, making them unsuitable for safety-critical applications without additional safety measures.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a safety concept that defers application logic to a reliable machine control entity, using smartphones as display and sensor devices, and validating sensor data through sequence monitoring and plausibility testing to ensure safe operation, thereby reducing risks and enhancing reliability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If smartphones are used for controlling safety-critical machinery, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a machine control entity as an intermediary between the smartphone and the machinery. The smartphone serves only as a user interface, while the machine control entity processes control signals and validates sensor data, ensuring reliability while maintaining ease of operation through the smartphone interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system is segmented into distinct functional components: the smartphone handles user interaction, the machine control entity handles signal processing and validation, and the machinery executes operations. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific function while maintaining overall system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If sensor data validation is implemented, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The machine control entity acts as an intermediary that centralizes the complex validation logic. Instead of distributing validation complexity across multiple components, the intermediary handles all sensor data validation, sequence monitoring, and plausibility testing in one location, maintaining reliability while managing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the machine control entity continuously validates sensor data and provides feedback on data quality. This feedback loop ensures reliability by detecting and correcting issues early, while the automated nature of the feedback reduces the perceived complexity for users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3165974B1Apparatuses, methods and computer programs for controlling a machine via a mobile communication device
Publication Date: 2021.12.15 DEERE & CO
  • EP3165974B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3165974B1 patent drawingFigure 1a
  • EP3165974B1 patent drawingFigure 1b

AI summary

Embodiments relate to apparatuses (10; 30), methods and computer programs for controlling a machine. The apparatus (10) is suitable for a mobile communication device (100) for providing a sensor input signal to a machine control entity (300) to control a machine (350). The apparatus (10) comprises one or more sensor modules (12) for providing first user input sensor data and second user input sensor data. The apparatus further comprises a control module (16) configured to determine the sensor input signal based on the first user input sensor data and the second user input sensor data. The control module (16) is further configured to provide the sensor input signal for sensor data processing to the machine control entity (300) to control the machine (350) via an interface (18).