Smartphone Driver Distraction Control via Vehicle Speed Thresholds

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Driving while using electronic devices with keypads or displays poses significant distraction, particularly for solo drivers, and existing solutions require universal implementation by service providers and legislation, which is challenging without restrictions on texting, reading, and incoming messages, while allowing emergency calls and voice communications.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a 'no user action' solution that automatically restricts certain phone functions, such as texting and display interactions, when a phone is in use by a solo driver, with override transmitters allowing passenger phones to remain unrestricted, using Bluetooth and SMS connections to authenticate and determine usage patterns, and integrating with vehicle sensors for speed and acceleration detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If phone functions are restricted when moving faster than threshold speed, then driver distraction is reduced, but passenger phone usability is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver distractionVSAvoidphone usability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different restriction rules to different users based on their role (driver vs. passenger). The driver's phone is restricted when the vehicle exceeds threshold speed, while the passenger's phone remains fully functional. This is achieved by detecting the presence of multiple phones and identifying which one belongs to the driver versus passenger, allowing localized application of restriction quality to each device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If all phones are automatically restricted when moving, then driver safety is improved, but emergency communication capability is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver safetyVSAvoidemergency communication
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system preemptively blocks distracting functions (texting, display interaction) before they can cause accidents, while preserving essential functions (voice calls). This preliminary restriction prevents the harmful action of driver distraction while maintaining the beneficial capability of emergency communication through voice channels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts and removes only the distracting functions (texting, reading, writing, display interaction) from the phone's operational set when the driver is moving above threshold speed, while leaving essential functions (voice calls) intact. This selective extraction maintains emergency communication capability while eliminating safety hazards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If restriction systems are implemented in vehicles, then driver distraction is reduced, but implementation time and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver distractionVSAvoidimplementation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the existing smartphone and its accelerometer as an intermediary device to detect vehicle motion and trigger restrictions, eliminating the need for dedicated vehicle-mounted restriction systems. The smartphone acts as a bridge between vehicle motion detection and phone function control, enabling implementation through software updates rather than hardware installation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The smartphone's built-in accelerometer and processing capabilities are leveraged to perform the restriction logic autonomously. The phone self-monitors its own motion state through the accelerometer and automatically applies restriction rules without requiring external vehicle system intervention, reducing implementation complexity and time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If threshold speed restriction is applied, then driver safety is improved, but phone functionality at low speeds is unnecessarily limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver safetyVSAvoidphone accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The restriction system dynamically adjusts its behavior based on the vehicle's speed threshold. When the vehicle is stationary or moving below the threshold speed, all phone functions remain fully accessible. When the vehicle exceeds the threshold speed, restrictions are dynamically applied. This dynamic adaptation ensures phone functionality is preserved during low-speed maneuvers while maintaining safety during high-speed driving.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11575782B2Transmitter near a phone restricts some functions not all
Publication Date: 2023.02.07 HALEY JEFFREY T
  • US11575782B2 patent drawing
  • US11575782B2 patent drawing
  • US11575782B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method to automatically modify the functionality of telephones when they are located in particular environments. Located in each such environment is a low power radio transmitter with limited range. When the telephone detects a signal from the low power transmitter, the telephone changes its mode of operation such as by turning off a speaker or a ring signal capability or a normal display capability or a normal key input capability. The environment may be within a vehicle.