Smartphone Deep Learning Personal Danger Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems lack an effective method to proactively detect personal danger and respond appropriately, especially in situations where individuals are already in physical danger, as existing devices require manual initiation of emergency calls and do not assess risk levels.

Innovation Solution

A deep learning system on a mobile device monitors user safety by comparing current environmental information to a routine profile, generating a risk score, and sending alerts or emergency messages based on predefined thresholds, using location, audio, and other metrics to assess potential danger.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If manual emergency call systems are used, then device complexity is reduced, but response time and effectiveness in personal danger detection deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidpersonal danger detection effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously monitoring environmental data and comparing it against stored routine profiles before danger occurs. The deep learning system pre-processes location, audio, and sensor data to establish baseline safety patterns, enabling proactive danger detection rather than reactive response

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system serves itself by automatically analyzing environmental information against user routine profiles without requiring manual intervention. The deep learning model autonomously generates risk scores and triggers alerts when danger thresholds are exceeded, eliminating the need for users to manually assess or report danger

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If deep learning analysis is implemented, then personal danger detection accuracy is improved, but device complexity and processing requirements worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk assessment accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the danger detection process into distinct functional modules: data collection from multiple sensors, environmental information processing, routine profile comparison, risk score generation, and alert triggering. This modular segmentation allows the deep learning system to handle complex analysis through specialized sub-components rather than a monolithic system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds temporal dimensionality by comparing current environmental data against historical routine profiles stored in the database. The deep learning model analyzes patterns across time dimensions, comparing present conditions with past safe conditions to generate comprehensive risk assessments that consider both spatial and temporal factors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If continuous monitoring is performed, then personal safety detection capability is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety monitoring capabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic monitoring by continuously collecting environmental data and comparing it against routine profiles at regular intervals. The deep learning model processes data in periodic cycles, generating risk scores at scheduled times rather than requiring constant real-time analysis, thus reducing overall energy consumption while maintaining effective safety monitoring

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial monitoring by focusing computational resources on analyzing only the most critical environmental parameters and comparing them against key aspects of routine profiles. The deep learning model performs selective analysis rather than exhaustive processing of all available data, reducing energy consumption while maintaining adequate detection capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11455522B2Detecting personal danger using a deep learning system
Publication Date: 2022.09.27 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11455522B2 patent drawing
  • US11455522B2 patent drawing
  • US11455522B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A mobile electronic device such as a smartphone is used in conjunction with a deep learning system to detect and respond to personal danger. The deep learning system monitors current information (such as location, audio, biometrics, etc.) from the smartphone and generates a risk score by comparing the information to a routine profile for the user. If the risk score exceeds a predetermined threshold, an alert is sent to the smartphone which presents an alert screen to the user. The alert screen allows the user to cancel the alert (and notify the deep learning system) or confirm the alert (and immediately transmit an emergency message). Multiple emergency contacts can be designated, e.g., one for a low-level risk, another for an intermediate-level risk, and another for a high-level risk, and the emergency message can be sent to a selected contact depending upon the severity of the risk score.