Soft Magnetic Composite Baseplate for Eddy Current Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Permanent magnet machines, particularly fractional slot concentrated winding machines, experience high eddy current losses leading to reduced efficiency and increased rotor temperature, which can result in premature power de-rating or magnet demagnetization, with existing solutions like magnet segmentation and laminated baseplates being costly or limited to large machines.

Innovation Solution

A permanent magnet module using a baseplate made of soft magnetic composite material, segmented into portions aligned parallel to the circumferential direction of the machine, combined with a non-magnetic cover to minimize airgap and reduce eddy current losses, while maintaining mechanical integrity and reducing manufacturing costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If magnet segmentation is used to reduce eddy current losses, then eddy current losses are reduced, but manufacturing cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeddy current lossesVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The baseplate is segmented into multiple portions arranged circumferentially around the rotor, with each portion having a different circumferential extension than the permanent magnet it supports. This segmentation disrupts eddy current paths while maintaining structural integrity and simplifying manufacturing compared to segmenting the magnets themselves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The baseplate portions are designed with non-uniform circumferential extensions, creating local variations in the magnetic circuit that specifically target eddy current reduction in high-loss regions while maintaining optimal magnetic coupling where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of energy

If laminated baseplates are used to reduce eddy current losses, then eddy current losses are reduced, but manufacturing cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeddy current lossesVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The baseplate is constructed from composite material composed of electrically insulating granulated material mixed with binder material, providing eddy current reduction equivalent to laminated structures but at lower manufacturing cost and without the complexity of layer-by-layer lamination processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The electrical properties of the baseplate material are modified by incorporating insulating granulated material, changing the electrical conductivity parameter to reduce eddy currents while maintaining mechanical strength and manufacturability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Length of moving object

If a metallic cover is used to reduce mechanical airgap, then mechanical airgap is reduced, but magnetic airgap increases due to flux leakage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical airgapVSAvoidmagnetic coupling
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A non-magnetic intermediate material is used between the permanent magnet and the metallic cover, allowing the cover to provide mechanical support and reduce mechanical airgap while the non-magnetic material prevents magnetic flux leakage, thereby maintaining magnetic coupling efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Significantly reduces eddy current losses, enhancing the efficiency of permanent magnet machines and increasing annual energy production in wind turbines by effectively managing rotor losses without significant cost increases.

Implementation Method 1

the high level of sub-harmonic in the airgap flux density leads to large amounts of eddy current losses in the rotor (magnet and baseplate and rotor house)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEddy current losses: Eddy Currents

Implementation Method 2

the metallic airgap between stator and rotor is reduced by the thickness of the cover. The stainless-steel cover is normally not magnetically conductive, so that it does not reduce the magnetic airgap or the torque due to flux leakage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic flux density: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentEP3567701B1Magnet module for a permanent magnet machine
Publication Date: 2023.02.01 SIEMENS GAMESA RENEWABLE ENERGY AS
  • EP3567701B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3567701B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3567701B1 patent drawingFigure 4~6

AI summary

A permanent magnet module (101, 102, 103, 104) for a permanent magnet machine (10) comprises at least a permanent magnet (200) fixed to a baseplate (301, 302, 303) comprising a soft magnetic composite material.