Smoke Detector Availability Test System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Smoke detectors are often compromised during building renovations, leading to false alarms and potential safety hazards due to protective coverings that prevent smoke ingress, and existing methods rely on visual assessments which are inefficient for large-scale detection.

Innovation Solution

A smoke detector test system incorporating a test unit with a proximity sensor and an in situ aerosol tester that detects obstructions and signals to the fire alarm control panel, ensuring the detector's availability for smoke detection, using a combination of proximity sensing and aerosol persistence to determine if smoke access is compromised.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If protective coverings are placed over smoke detectors during building renovations, then false alarms are prevented and detectors are protected from contaminants, but smoke detection capability is compromised and safety is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse alarms from contaminantsVSAvoidsmoke detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A test unit with proximity sensor acts as an intermediary between the protective covering and the detector system. The proximity sensor detects the presence of coverings without triggering false alarms, while simultaneously alerting the control panel to the reduced smoke detection capability, thus mediating between protection needs and safety monitoring

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring detector availability through the proximity sensor and communicating status to the control panel. This feedback loop allows the system to track when detectors are covered and maintain an accurate record of available detection capacity, enabling proactive safety management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of manufacture

If visual assessment methods are used to check detector availability, then implementation is simple and requires no additional equipment, but efficiency is low and large-scale detection is impractical

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidassessment efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The detector system performs self-assessment of its availability status through the integrated proximity sensor and test unit. Each detector automatically monitors its own covering status and communicates with the control panel, eliminating the need for manual visual inspection while maintaining ease of implementation through existing detector infrastructure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual visual assessment process is replaced by an automated electronic sensing system. The proximity sensor and control panel communication system substitute for human engineers performing visual checks, dramatically improving assessment efficiency and productivity while keeping the system easy to implement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Duration of action of stationary object

If detectors remain installed during long-term building works, then continuous monitoring is maintained, but detectors become compromised by paint, dust and other contaminants

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous monitoring periodVSAvoidcontaminant ingress
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The proximity sensor provides preliminary detection of protective coverings before contaminants can compromise the detector. By detecting the presence of coverings early, the system allows for proactive management decisions about detector relocation or protection, preventing contaminant damage while maintaining continuous monitoring capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively identifies and communicates the status of smoke detector obstructions, reducing false alarms and ensuring continuous fire safety monitoring by automating the detection of coverings and maintaining detector functionality during renovations.

Implementation Method 1

The test unit may comprise an assembly that plugs directly into the detector's existing base. This provides a proximity sensor means to identify an obstruction in the immediate vicinity of the detector.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectProximity sensing: Capacitance

Implementation Method 2

This may also be combined with an in situ detector test means for producing a test aerosol.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerosol generation: Aerosol

Data Source

PatentUS11615699B2Smoke detector availability test
Publication Date: 2023.03.28 TYCO FIRE & SECURITY GMBH
  • US11615699B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a system for testing the availability of a detector for detecting smoke. More specifically, the present invention relates to a detector with a testing unit arranged to detect whether the detector has been covered, such that it is unable to perform its function as a smoke detector.