Smoke Detector Self-Testing via Integrated Vaporizer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing smoke detectors require manual testing with smoke or aerosol, which is time-consuming and resource-intensive, and there is a need for a more efficient method to verify their operational state and predict cartridge depletion.

Innovation Solution

A smoke detector with an integrated electronic vaporizer and controller that periodically activates to produce vaporized particulates, allowing for automatic self-testing and communication of operational states to a monitoring panel, while tracking the number of tests to predict cartridge depletion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual testing with smoke or aerosol is performed, then the operational state of the smoke detector can be verified, but the process is time-consuming and resource-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification of operational stateVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The smoke detector performs self-testing by generating its own test aerosol using an integrated vaporizer that heats liquid to produce vaporized particulates. The controller automatically activates the vaporizer, directs vapor into the optical chamber, and evaluates sensor responses without requiring external manual testing equipment or personnel intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary self-diagnostics by periodically generating test aerosol and evaluating sensor responses before actual smoke detection scenarios occur. The controller proactively tests optical chamber functionality, sensor operation, and communication systems during scheduled intervals, ensuring readiness ahead of potential emergencies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If manual testing is performed periodically, then operational faults can be detected, but frequent manual intervention increases resource consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection capabilityVSAvoidresource efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The smoke detector autonomously performs fault detection by internally generating test aerosol through the vaporizer and evaluating sensor responses. The controller automatically determines operational states (functional, degraded, or failed) and communicates results to monitoring panels without requiring external personnel, thereby eliminating the resource consumption associated with manual testing while maintaining continuous reliability verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Extent of automation

If the controller activates the vaporizer to produce vaporized particulate, then automatic self-testing can be performed, but additional components are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveself-testing capabilityVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The integrated vaporizer serves multiple functions: it generates test aerosol for self-testing, and can potentially serve as a notification device or air purification component. The optical chamber is used both for normal smoke detection and for self-testing by directing vaporized particulates through the same sensing path, thereby adding automation capability while minimizing additional hardware requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If the controller registers the number of operational tests performed, then cartridge depletion can be predicted, but the system requires tracking and memory functions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredictive maintenance capabilityVSAvoidtracking system requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller implements a feedback mechanism that counts and records the number of operational tests performed using the liquid cartridge. By tracking this usage data, the system predicts when the cartridge will be depleted and proactively notifies users or maintenance personnel, enabling predictive maintenance. The communication interface transmits this information to external monitoring panels, providing a simple yet effective reliability enhancement with minimal additional complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables automatic and periodic self-testing of smoke detectors, allowing for early problem detection, reducing manual intervention and resource consumption, and ensuring timely replacement of cartridges.

Implementation Method 1

an electronic vaporizer/atomizer for vaporizing liquid within the cartridge

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVaporization: Evaporation

Implementation Method 2

an optical chamber in which a particulate sensor is directed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight scattering: Scattering

Data Source

PatentEP3690842B1Smoke detector with integrated vaporizer and method for executing self-testing
Publication Date: 2022.12.07 CARRIER CORP
  • EP3690842B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3690842B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Disclosed is a smoke detector 200 having a controller 220 configured for executing an operational test, the operational test including: activating an electronic vaporizer 260 to produce vaporized particulate 270 within the smoke detector 200; rendering a first determination of whether a particulate sensor 230 disposed in the detector 200 senses the vaporized particulate 270; and rendering a second determination based on the first determination, the second determination identifying an operational state of the smoke detector 200.