Smooth-Strap Cable Tie Locking Head for Tighter Bundling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Prior art cable tie arrangements with periodic raised elements result in poor bundling due to tension being determined by spacing, leading to loose bundling of elongate elements like wires and cables.

Innovation Solution

A cable tie arrangement featuring a continuous strap with a smooth planar surface and a locking head with metal teeth that engage the strap to prevent movement in one direction while allowing tightening, ensuring optimal bundling by gripping the strap's surface rather than raised protrusions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If periodic raised elements are used on the strap to engage the locking head, then the cable tie can be manufactured with a simple structure, but the bundling quality deteriorates due to loose tension distribution

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidbundling quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the engagement features from the strap surface by removing the periodic raised elements. Instead, the strap maintains a smooth planar surface, and the locking head incorporates the engagement features (teeth) within its body. This separation allows the strap to be simpler to manufacture while the locking head provides reliable engagement for optimal bundling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention applies local quality by concentrating the engagement functionality in specific locations within the locking head rather than distributing raised elements along the entire strap. The teeth are strategically positioned to engage the strap at critical points, providing reliable bundling without requiring complex strap geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If the strap has a smooth planar surface without raised elements, then optimal bundling is achieved through better tension distribution, but the engagement mechanism becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebundling qualityVSAvoidlocking head complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking head is segmented into distinct functional components: the body providing structural support, the teeth for engagement, and the opening for strap passage. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently - the smooth strap engages with the segmented teeth structure, achieving reliable bundling while maintaining manufacturability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If opposed teeth extend towards one another in the opening, then the strap sections are pressed together for secure engagement, but the gap between teeth must be precisely controlled

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengagement securityVSAvoidgap dimensioning
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention optimizes the gap parameter between opposed teeth to be substantially twice the strap thickness. This specific parameter relationship ensures that when the teeth engage the strap, they press the strap sections together with optimal force without requiring excessive manufacturing precision. The gap dimension is directly related to the strap thickness, providing a scalable solution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution provides secure and optimal bundling of elongate elements by allowing the strap to be tightened based on the overall cross-section of the elements, resulting in better tension distribution and preventing loose bundling.

Implementation Method 1

the opposed teeth are arranged to engage the planar surface of the end section and the supply section to prevent movement of the end section and the supply section

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

a metal locking element comprising a pair of opposed teeth extending into the opening and arranged to engage the strap in the opening

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical interlocking: Mechanical Fastener

Implementation Method 3

the opposed teeth extend towards one another in the opening, so as to press the end section and the supply section together in the opening

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNormal force: Force

Data Source

PatentEP4209697B1A cable tie arrangement
Publication Date: 2024.10.09 ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
  • EP4209697B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4209697B1 patent drawingFigure 3~6
  • EP4209697B1 patent drawingFigure 7~9C

AI summary

The cable tie arrangement comprises a continuous strap (50) having a planar surface free of any racks and a separate locking head (100) defining an opening and having a metal locking element (110) comprising a pair of opposed teeth (115) extending into the opening for engaging the strap in the opening. In use, the continuous strap comprises a looped section for bundling elongate elements on a first side of the locking head. The looped section has an end section and a supply section. The opposed teeth engage the planar surface of the end section and the supply section to prevent movement of the end section and the supply section in one direction and to allow movement of the supply section in the other direction. The opposed teeth extend towards one another in the opening so as to press the end section and the supply section together in the opening.