Sedimentation Tower With Smooth Walls for Faster Solids Settling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for settling and compacting particles in wastewater are inefficient, requiring significant time and resulting in high-fluid content slurry due to low compressive loads and frictional support from tank walls, leading to increased handling costs and reduced efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A sedimentation tower with angled sidewalls (0-15°) and smooth interior surfaces, combined with an inlet above the midpoint and an outlet near the top, and a system of parallel augers to compact particles, measuring viscosity for optimal extraction when the desired fluid content is achieved.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If traditional settling tanks with tapered lower sections are used, then particles can be directed to central extraction mechanism, but compressive load on lower particles is reduced and settling time extends significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle extractionVSAvoidsettling time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the traditional tapered geometry by using vertical or substantially vertical side walls instead of tapered walls. This inversion eliminates the frictional support effect that reduces compressive load, allowing particles to settle under full gravitational compression and achieve drier consistency faster.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the geometric parameter of the tank walls from tapered (angled) to vertical (0-15° from vertical). This parameter change fundamentally alters the force distribution on settled particles, maximizing compressive load and minimizing settling time while maintaining extractability through alternative means.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If tapered lower sections are used in settling tanks, then particles are directed to extraction mechanism, but frictional forces support particles and reduce compressive load

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle extractionVSAvoidcompressive load
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the traditional tapered geometry by using vertical or substantially vertical side walls instead of tapered walls. This inversion eliminates the frictional support effect that reduces compressive load, allowing particles to settle under full gravitational compression and achieve drier consistency faster.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the extraction function from the settling geometry by using a separate extraction mechanism (augers, pumps, or conveyors) rather than relying on tapered walls to direct particles. This allows the settling zone to optimize for compressive load while extraction is handled by dedicated equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If settling ponds are used with plenty of space, then solids can settle over long periods, but space requirements and time are excessive for urban settings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesettling efficiencyVSAvoidspace requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from horizontal settling ponds to vertical settling towers, utilizing the vertical dimension to achieve compact design. The vertical orientation with vertical walls maximizes compressive load on particles while minimizing the horizontal footprint, making the system suitable for urban environments with limited space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the geometric parameter of the tank walls from tapered (angled) to vertical (0-15° from vertical). This parameter change fundamentally alters the force distribution on settled particles, maximizing compressive load and minimizing settling time while maintaining extractability through alternative means.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of operation

If vertical augers are used at the base for sediment removal, then extraction is achieved, but compressive forces are limited by the reactive force of the material plug

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesediment extractionVSAvoidcompressive force
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the extraction function from the settling geometry by using a separate extraction mechanism (augers, pumps, or conveyors) rather than relying on tapered walls to direct particles. This allows the settling zone to optimize for compressive load while extraction is handled by dedicated equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses multiple extraction mechanisms positioned around the periphery rather than a single central auger. This distributed extraction system provides multiple reaction points and can apply greater total compressive force while maintaining the ability to remove settled material effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The sedimentation tower effectively reduces fluid content to a manageable level, allowing easier handling and transportation of settled particles as solids, enhancing efficiency and reducing handling costs.

Implementation Method 1

When wastewater is clarified via gravity settling it is common to collect the sediment in the base of the tank

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity settling: Gravitation

Implementation Method 2

a sedimentation tower for settling, compacting and extracting particles in waste water

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSedimentation: Sedimentation

Implementation Method 3

Compressing the settled particles through a vertical auger may provide some means of reducing the fluid content of the settled particles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Data Source

PatentUS20250276259A1Improved Sedimentation Tower
Publication Date: 2025.09.04 WYMA ENG NZ
  • US20250276259A1 patent drawing
  • US20250276259A1 patent drawing
  • US20250276259A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A sedimentation tower which includes a tank in which the sidewalls are at an angle to the vertical in the range 0-15°, and in which the walls in at least the lower half of the tank are smooth on the interior of the tank; the tank having an inlet at one side in the upper half of the tank for the admission of wastewater to be clarified and an outlet for the discharge of clarified water at the other side of the tank, closer to the top of the tank than said inlet; the tank having at least one solids outlet in or adjacent the base of the tank, for extracting settled particles from the tank.