SMR Storage Controller Cache Indirection for Non-Sequential Writes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing storage systems face compatibility issues and unpredictable performance when managing non-sequential or random writes to Shingled Magnetic Recording (SMR) drives due to the sequential writing requirements of SMR technology, which are not inherently supported by conventional storage systems.

Innovation Solution

A storage controller with a data cache acts as an indirection layer to convert non-sequential write requests into sequential writes for SMR devices, using a thinly provisioned volume and metadata mapping to optimize data management, ensuring contiguous block writing and efficient cache utilization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional storage systems manage non-sequential writes to SMR drives, then host compatibility is maintained, but system performance becomes unpredictable and hardware compatibility issues arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehost compatibilityVSAvoidsystem performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a storage controller as an intermediary layer between the host and SMR drives. The controller contains a cache that buffers write operations and a mapping structure that translates non-sequential host write requests into sequential writes to the SMR drive. This intermediary approach maintains host compatibility while ensuring reliable sequential writing to SMR media, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If SMR drives use sequential writing to prevent overwriting overlapping tracks, then data integrity is maintained, but the drive cannot accommodate random or non-sequential write requests from conventional storage systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata integrityVSAvoidwrite operation flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the storage system into three distinct layers: the host system, the storage controller with cache and mapping structure, and the SMR drive. This segmentation allows each layer to operate independently with its own optimization - the host can issue any type of write request, the controller manages the conversion to sequential writes, and the SMR drive maintains data integrity through sequential writing. The mapping structure divides the logical address space into zones that can be sequentially filled.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The storage controller acts as an intermediary that translates between the flexible non-sequential write requests from conventional hosts and the rigid sequential write requirements of SMR drives. The cache buffers incoming writes and the mapping structure redirects them to appropriate sequential locations, enabling SMR drives to maintain data integrity while appearing as conventional drives to hosts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If firmware or host software is modified to manage non-sequential writes to SMR drives, then write flexibility is improved, but hardware compatibility issues and increased system complexity arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewrite operation flexibilityVSAvoidfirmware or software complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent places the complexity management function in the storage controller firmware rather than requiring host software modifications. The controller's mapping structure and cache management algorithms handle the complexity of translating non-sequential writes to sequential writes, while the host system remains unchanged. This approach provides write flexibility without increasing host software complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The storage controller performs self-service by automatically managing the conversion of non-sequential writes to sequential writes through its internal cache and mapping structure. The system does not require external host software modifications or complex firmware changes in the SMR drive itself - the controller handles all complexity internally, presenting a simple interface to both the host and the SMR drive.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10521345B2Managing input/output operations for shingled magnetic recording in a storage system
Publication Date: 2019.12.31 NETAPP INC
  • US10521345B2 patent drawing
  • US10521345B2 patent drawing
  • US10521345B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for improving the management of data input and output (I/O) operations for Shingled Magnetic Recording (SMR) devices in a network storage system is disclosed. The storage system includes a storage controller that receives a series of write requests for data blocks to be written to non-sequential addresses within a pool of SMR devices. The storage controller writes the data blocks from the series of write requests to a corresponding sequence of data clusters allocated within a first data cache of the storage controller for a thinly provisioned volume of the pool of SMR devices. Upon determining that a current utilization of the first data cache's data storage capacity exceeds a threshold, the sequence of data clusters including the data blocks from the first data cache are transferred to sequential physical addresses within the SMR devices.