SMS Text Authorization for Mobile Payment Security

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for mobile online financial transactions are cumbersome and time-consuming due to the need for multiple confirmations and PIN entries, especially on mobile devices, which are less stable and have smaller keypads compared to desktop devices.

Innovation Solution

A system that allows users to initiate and authorize money transfers via SMS using 'yes' or 'y' for trusted recipients, with the option to add recipients as trusted sources for future quick approvals, reducing the need for PIN verification in trusted relationships.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple confirmations and PIN entries are required for mobile transactions, then security is improved, but transaction time and user convenience deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidtransaction time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the authentication process into two distinct modes: a simplified path for trusted recipients using only SMS confirmation, and a secure path for untrusted recipients requiring PIN entry. This segmentation allows the system to apply appropriate security measures selectively, reducing time for trusted transactions while maintaining security for unknown recipients.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-establishing trusted recipient relationships before transactions occur. Users designate trusted recipients in advance, creating a whitelist that enables rapid SMS-only authentication for future transactions with these contacts, eliminating the need for repeated PIN entries while maintaining security through prior authorization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If multiple confirmations and PIN entries are required for mobile transactions, then fraud prevention is improved, but user convenience and ease of operation deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud preventionVSAvoiduser convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The authentication process is divided into separate pathways: SMS-only confirmation for trusted recipients and PIN-required confirmation for untrusted recipients. This segmentation provides users with convenient fast-track access for familiar contacts while maintaining robust fraud prevention for unknown recipients, optimizing the balance between ease of operation and security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different authentication requirements are applied locally based on the recipient relationship. Trusted recipients receive the benefit of simplified SMS-only authentication, while untrusted recipients trigger the full PIN-based security protocol. This local differentiation allows the system to be convenient where appropriate and secure where necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If simplified SMS confirmation is used for trusted recipients, then transaction speed and ease of operation are improved, but security risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction speedVSAvoidsecurity risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Security is addressed in advance by requiring users to explicitly designate trusted recipients before simplified SMS authentication can be used. This preliminary authorization step ensures that only pre-approved contacts benefit from the speedier SMS-only process, while maintaining security through prior user intent and explicit trust establishment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The trusted recipient list acts as an intermediary layer between the user and the simplified authentication process. This mediator verifies that the recipient is authorized for fast-track SMS confirmation, thereby enabling high transaction speed while mitigating security risk through an intermediate approval mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If PIN verification is required for all transactions, then security is improved, but device complexity and operational difficulty increase for mobile devices

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidoperational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments authentication requirements by recipient type, applying PIN verification only to untrusted recipients while using SMS-only confirmation for trusted recipients. This reduces operational complexity for the majority of transactions with familiar contacts while maintaining security for unknown recipients, avoiding the need for PIN entry in all cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The authentication system dynamically adapts its complexity based on the recipient relationship. For trusted recipients, the system uses the simpler SMS confirmation method; for untrusted recipients, it automatically escalates to the more secure PIN-based process. This dynamic adjustment optimizes for ease of operation when possible while maintaining security when necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8332314B2Text authorization for mobile payments
Publication Date: 2012.12.11 PAYPAL INC
  • US8332314B2 patent drawing
  • US8332314B2 patent drawing
  • US8332314B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method enables trusted sources to easily approve requests for money transfers by simply typing in a yes or equivalent.