Superconducting Nonlinear Asymmetric Inductive Element for Noise Isolation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional superconducting quantum information processing systems face challenges with noise reciprocity, where noise from room temperature electronics can interfere with low-temperature qubits, and the integration of non-reciprocal components like ferrites is difficult due to their bulkiness and magnetic field effects.

Innovation Solution

The development of a superconducting nonlinear asymmetric inductive element (SNAIL) with a cubic nonlinearity and no quartic interaction term, integrated into a parametric amplifier configuration, which breaks reciprocity using two SNAILs between couplers to create a low-noise directional amplifier, isolating qubits from noise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional superconducting quantum information processing systems are used, then quantum information processing can be performed, but noise from room temperature electronics interferes with low-temperature qubits

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise isolationVSAvoidnoise interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements non-reciprocal noise isolation using asymmetric couplers with different coupling strengths for forward and reverse directions. The first coupler has a first coupling strength for signals traveling from the qubit to the amplifier, while the second coupler has a second coupling strength for signals traveling in the opposite direction, creating asymmetric noise isolation that protects qubits from room temperature electronics noise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Reliability

If non-reciprocal components like ferrites are integrated, then noise isolation can be achieved, but the components are bulky and create magnetic field effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise isolationVSAvoidcomponent integration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces bulky ferrite-based non-reciprocal components with superconducting asymmetric couplers that achieve non-reciprocal behavior through differential coupling strengths. This substitution eliminates the need for magnetic field-generating ferrite materials and their associated bulkiness, while maintaining noise isolation functionality in a compact, integrated form factor suitable for quantum circuits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If asymmetric couplers with different coupling strengths are used, then non-reciprocal noise isolation is achieved, but the coupling strengths must be precisely controlled

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenon-reciprocal isolationVSAvoidcoupling strength control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves non-reciprocal coupling by adjusting physical parameters of the asymmetric couplers, such as geometric dimensions, capacitor values, or inductor values. By changing these parameters during design and fabrication, the coupling strengths can be precisely controlled to achieve the desired asymmetric coupling behavior without requiring post-fabrication tuning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution reduces noise interference by creating a non-reciprocal, high-fidelity measurement system that isolates qubits from noise, enhancing the reliability of quantum information processing without relying on magnetic fields, and allows for easier integration into integrated circuits.

Implementation Method 1

a Josephson junction coupled between the two nodes. The Josephson junction is characterized by a superconducting phase difference, φ, and the superconducting device has a potential that varies as a function of the superconducting phase difference, φ

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJosephson effect: Josephson Effect

Implementation Method 2

a magnetic flux generation device positioned in proximity to the superconducting ring and configured to generate an external DC magnetic flux through the superconducting ring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic flux: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 3

Superconducting nonlinear asymmetric inductive element and related systems and methods

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuperconductivity: Superconductivity

Data Source

PatentUS11737376B2Superconducting nonlinear asymmetric inductive element and related systems and methods
Publication Date: 2023.08.22 YALE UNIVERSITY
  • US11737376B2 patent drawing
  • US11737376B2 patent drawing
  • US11737376B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A superconducting device includes two nodes and a Josephson junction coupled between the two nodes, wherein the Josephson junction is characterized by a superconducting phase difference, φ, wherein the superconducting device has a potential that varies as a function of the superconducting phase difference, φ, and has a single potential well. The potential has a non-zero cubic term and quartic term is zero. The Josephson junction may be a single small Josephson junction. The superconducting device may include a superconducting ring connected between the two nodes. The superconducting ring may include a first ring portion with a plurality of large Josephson junctions connected in series. The superconducting ring may also include a second ring portion that includes the single small Josephson junction in parallel with the plurality of large Josephson junctions between the two nodes.