Snake-Arm Tool Placement in Engines With Decoupled Servicing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing robotic servicing devices, such as rigid and flexible guide tubes, struggle with precision positioning and reusability when navigating complex paths within engines, limiting their ability to perform a range of tasks efficiently.

Innovation Solution

A snake-arm robot is mechanically coupled with a servicing device, allowing it to navigate complex paths and precisely position tools like borescopes or flexible guide tubes within engines, enabling the snake-arm robot to be decoupled once the desired location is reached, leaving the device in place for further operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If rigid guide tubes are used for positioning, then positioning precision is improved, but adaptability to complex paths deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning precisionVSAvoidadaptability to complex paths
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static rigid guide tubes to a dynamic snake-arm robot that can actively adapt its configuration. The robot's segments can bend and flex to navigate complex engine passages while maintaining positioning precision through active control of each segment's degree of freedom.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The snake-arm robot employs flexible segmented structure that can bend and conform to complex paths within engine components. This flexibility allows the robot to access confined and irregularly shaped areas that rigid guide tubes cannot reach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

2Adaptability or versatility

If flexible guide tubes are used for navigation, then adaptability to complex paths is improved, but positioning precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to complex pathsVSAvoidpositioning precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The snake-arm robot combines flexibility with active dynamic control. Each segment can be independently actuated to achieve precise positioning at the distal end while navigating complex paths, overcoming the passive flexibility limitation of traditional guide tubes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The robot is divided into multiple controllable segments with degrees of freedom at each joint. This segmentation allows independent control of each section, enabling the system to navigate complex paths while maintaining precise positioning capability at the endpoint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If snake-arm robot is used for navigation, then adaptability to complex paths and positioning precision are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to complex pathsVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The snake-arm robot serves multiple functions: it acts as both the navigation mechanism and the positioning system, eliminating the need for separate rigid guide tubes. The same robotic structure performs path navigation, positioning, and can carry various servicing tools, reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The snake-arm robot can be inserted into and removed from the engine repeatedly, and the servicing device remains nested within the robot during insertion. This nesting approach allows the complex robot to be stored and deployed efficiently without requiring separate complex deployment mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

4Productivity

If servicing device is left in place for reuse, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice reusabilityVSAvoiddecoupling mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is segmented into the snake-arm robot and the servicing device, allowing independent removal of the robot while leaving the servicing device in place. This segmentation enables the servicing device to remain installed for repeated use across multiple engines or inspection cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The snake-arm robot is extracted from the engine after positioning, leaving the servicing device behind. This extraction approach allows the complex robotic navigation system to be removed for reuse while the simpler servicing device remains installed for continued productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentEP4592021A1Method and apparatus for servicing engines
Publication Date: 2025.07.30 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • EP4592021A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4592021A1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP4592021A1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B

AI summary

A snake-arm robot (102) and a servicing device (104) are mechanically coupled. The mechanical coupling is accomplished by a longitudinal insertion of the snake-arm robot (102) into the servicing device (104) or the servicing device (104) into the snake-arm robot (102). An actuator (106) moves the snake-arm robot (102) through a passage (113) within an engine (110) until the snake-arm robot (102) reaches a desired location. The movement of the snake-arm robot (102) concurrently moves the servicing device (104) through the passage (113). Subsequent to reaching the desired location and position, the snake-arm robot (102) is de-coupled from the servicing device (104) and the snake-arm robot (102) is removed from the engine (110) while leaving the servicing device (104) in place within the engine (110).