SNAP Device Fabrication with Sub-Angstrom Radius Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for fabricating miniature resonant photonic devices face challenges such as surface roughness, inaccuracies in fabrication, and cumulative errors in creating long chains of microresonators, leading to reduced performance due to nanometer-scale non-uniformities and other fabrication errors.

Innovation Solution

A method involving characterization and correction of the effective radius of surface nanoscale axial photonic (SNAP) devices using a 'characterize and correct' process, which includes determining local effective radius variations, applying a calibration factor, and correcting individual microdevices through annealing or UV radiation treatments to achieve sub-Angstrom accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional lithographic techniques are used to create resonator structures, then the devices can be manufactured with standard fabrication processes, but surface roughness is introduced leading to scattering of optical signals and reduced Q factor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefabrication processVSAvoidQ factor
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical lithographic etching processes with a field-based approach using focused ion beams or laser-induced annealing to create resonator structures. This substitution eliminates mechanical contact and surface roughness while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through established beam fabrication techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the fabrication parameter from contact-based mechanical etching to non-contact beam-based modification. By controlling beam parameters (focus position, energy density, exposure time), the resonator structures are created with smooth surfaces and precise dimensions, eliminating scattering losses while maintaining manufacturability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If sub-wavelength resonators are created to improve performance, then device performance is enhanced, but fabrication accuracy becomes more difficult to achieve

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice performanceVSAvoidfabrication accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical lithography with beam-based fabrication methods (focused ion beams or laser annealing) that can achieve sub-wavelength precision without mechanical limitations. The beam can be focused to diffraction-limited spots, enabling creation of resonators smaller than the wavelength of light while maintaining fabrication accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates measurement and feedback mechanisms during fabrication to monitor and adjust beam parameters in real-time. This feedback control ensures precise positioning and dimensional control of sub-wavelength structures, maintaining manufacturing accuracy despite the reduced scale.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If long chains of microresonators are created, then complex photonic devices can be formed, but fabrication errors accumulate and impair performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice structureVSAvoidcumulative accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback control mechanisms that monitor resonator characteristics during fabrication and adjustment. By measuring actual resonator properties and comparing them to target values, the system can compensate for cumulative errors through real-time parameter adjustment, maintaining precision throughout long chains of microresonators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary calibration and characterization of the fabrication system before creating long chains of resonators. This preliminary action establishes baseline accuracy and allows for prediction of cumulative errors, enabling pre-compensation strategies to maintain precision throughout the entire device structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the creation of SNAP devices with sub-Angstrom precision, significantly reducing variations in resonant wavelength and improving the uniformity of complex structures, enhancing their optical characteristics and performance.

Implementation Method 1

a time-dependent annealing process or UV radiation exposure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAnnealing: Annealing

Implementation Method 2

a time-dependent annealing process or UV radiation exposure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUV radiation: Photopolymerisation

Data Source

PatentUS9127933B2Method of fabricating surface nanoscale axial photonic devices
Publication Date: 2015.09.08 OFS FITEL LLC
  • US9127933B2 patent drawing
  • US9127933B2 patent drawing
  • US9127933B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of characterizing and correcting effective radius variations in a surface nanoscale axial photonic (SNAP) device that comprises a plurality of separate optical microdevices includes the steps of characterizing an as-fabricated SNAP device to determine local effective radius values of the plurality of separate optical microdevices, calibrating the as-fabricated SNAP device to determine a correction factor defined as a change in effective radius associated with a predetermined corrective treatment and then correcting individual microdevices by the application of a number of refractive index-changing treatments, the number of treatments applied to individual microdevices determined by the amount of correction required and the correction factor determined in the calibrating step. A number of iterations of the characterizing and correcting operations can be performed, achieving less than an Angstrom variation in effective radius variation. An apparatus for performing the method is also disclosed.