Snap Fit Assembly for Ruggedized Enclosure with Case Hardening

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for assembling ruggedized structures, such as hollow steel enclosures for pressed explosives, often compromise metallurgical properties and safety due to welding or threading, which affects fragmentation performance and poses safety risks.

Innovation Solution

A snap-fit assembly design with case hardening or embrittlement processes is used to create a strong, secure coupling structure that avoids welding and threading, allowing for a 'final set' of the assembly without chemical bonding, while maintaining sufficient material properties for impact resistance and fragmentation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If welding is used to assemble the enclosure sections, then the structural strength and sealing are improved, but the metallurgical properties are altered and fragmentation performance is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidfragmentation performance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The enclosure is divided into multiple sections that are assembled through snap-fit interfaces rather than welded joints. This segmentation allows each section to maintain its original metallurgical properties and fragmentation characteristics while still achieving structural assembly through mechanical interlocking features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the thermal/mechanical welding process with a purely mechanical snap-fit assembly system. The snap-fit interface uses elastic deformation and geometric interlocking to join sections, eliminating the need for welding and preserving the metallurgical integrity of the materials for optimal fragmentation performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Strength

If threading is used to couple the enclosure sections, then the mechanical connection strength is improved, but the risk of initiating explosive material increases due to friction heat

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical connection strengthVSAvoidexplosive material initiation risk
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the threading mechanical system with a snap-fit system that uses elastic deformation and geometric interlocking. This substitution eliminates the friction-generated heat problem associated with threading while maintaining strong mechanical connections, thereby removing the hazard of explosive material initiation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the assembly method from high-friction threading to low-friction snap-fit engagement. By altering the mechanical interaction parameters from sliding friction to elastic deformation, the heat generation is minimized and the risk of initiating explosive materials is eliminated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If a press fit assembly with adhesive bonding is used, then the coupling strength is improved, but the production requirements and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoupling strengthVSAvoidproduction requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the adhesive bonding component from the assembly system, relying solely on the mechanical snap-fit interface for coupling strength. This extraction simplifies production by eliminating adhesive application, curing time, and quality control requirements while maintaining adequate coupling strength through optimized geometric interlocking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The snap-fit interface is designed to create its own coupling strength through elastic deformation and geometric interlocking without requiring external adhesives or additional fastening components. The structure itself provides the necessary coupling strength through its inherent mechanical properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Strength

If welding is used to pre-assemble the enclosure, then the structural integrity is improved, but the safety is compromised due to post-assembly explosive loading risks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidsafety
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The enclosure is segmented into separate sections that are mechanically joined through snap-fit interfaces, allowing the explosive to be loaded into the cavity before final assembly. This segmentation enables safe sequencing where the explosive is in place before the sections are coupled, eliminating post-assembly welding hazards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The explosive loading is performed as a preliminary action before the enclosure sections are assembled through snap-fit coupling. This sequencing allows the explosive to be safely positioned in the cavity before any mechanical joining occurs, eliminating the safety risk of welding near explosive materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The snap-fit assembly design provides a strong, secure, and aesthetically minimal coupling that withstands rough handling and impacts, maintains structural integrity, and facilitates efficient production with improved fragmentation performance and safety by minimizing the risk of explosive material initiation.

Implementation Method 1

designed to provide a coupling force sufficient to withstand rough handling and impacts

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

designed to destructively disassemble with a different and more desirable fragmentation pattern

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCase hardening: Case Hardening

Implementation Method 3

selective embrittlement or case hardening

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEmbrittlement:

Data Source

PatentUS9738948B2Snap fit assembly for a ruggedized multi-section structure with selective embrittlement or case hardening
Publication Date: 2017.08.22 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY
  • US9738948B2 patent drawing
  • US9738948B2 patent drawing
  • US9738948B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatus and methods associated with an enclosure or structure including two sections that are adapted with a snap-fit interlocking structure. Various embodiments of the enclosure or structures are formed with various case hardening or embrittlement processes to increase embrittlement or hardness of the enclosure or structure so as to create a structure or enclosure which has a desired fragmentation capacity while still maintaining sufficient material properties to permit snap-fit insertion of one section into another section and withstand substantial impacts. Embodiments also provide an interlocking structure that minimizes differences in fragmentation or fracturing capacity as contrasted with other portions of the structure or enclosure. An embodiment of the invention includes an enclosure where one section of the enclosure or structure has a first thickness and the second section has a second thickness, wherein the first and second thicknesses are different. In some embodiments, one section is thinner than another section.