Snap Hinge With Series Springs For Full Door Opening

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing snap hinges for interior furniture, particularly in caravans, face issues such as partial door compression limiting maximum opening, accidental door opening during movement, and high structural complexity with increased production costs due to complex anchoring systems.

Innovation Solution

A snap hinge design featuring a first and second articulated quadrilateral with shared levers, a coupling plate anchored to the cabinet wall, and elastic means arranged in series between the levers and an abutment element, providing stable support in both open and closed configurations with reduced structural complexity and cost.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single spring is used in the snap hinge, then the structure is simple, but the door cannot achieve maximum opening and may accidentally open during movement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehinge structureVSAvoiddoor support stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The single spring is divided into two separate springs that act on different articulated quadrilaterals. The first spring acts on the first articulated quadrilateral to provide support in the open configuration, while the second spring acts on the second articulated quadrilateral to prevent accidental opening in the closed configuration. This segmentation allows each spring to specialize in a specific function, improving overall reliability without requiring a complex single spring mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If two springs are arranged in parallel on a same articulated quadrilateral, then door support is improved, but the structure becomes more complex and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor support stabilityVSAvoidhinge structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of placing two springs in parallel on the same articulated quadrilateral, the invention segments them to act on different quadrilaterals. The first spring is associated with the first articulated quadrilateral (comprising first lever, second lever, and coupling plate), while the second spring is associated with the second articulated quadrilateral (comprising first lever, second lever, and fixing plate). This distribution reduces structural complexity while achieving the desired door support stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The two springs are arranged in series along the direction of motion of the door, rather than in parallel on the same plane. This dimensional arrangement allows the springs to work sequentially at different stages of door movement, providing stable support in both open and closed configurations without increasing structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If a bridge-shaped coupling plate is used for anchoring, then door support stability is improved, but production costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor support stabilityVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces the expensive bridge-shaped coupling plate with simpler, more cost-effective anchoring elements. The coupling plate and fixing plate are designed as simple plates with standard anchoring means (screws or other fastening elements), eliminating the need for complex bridge-shaped structures. This reduction in manufacturing complexity significantly lowers production costs while maintaining sufficient door support stability through the distributed spring system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The snap hinge ensures stable and safe support of closure elements in both configurations, allowing full door opening and preventing accidental opening, while minimizing production costs and structural complexity.

Implementation Method 1

a spring which acts between two mutually opposite points of one of the two articulated quadrilaterals

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

a spring which acts between two mutually opposite points of one of the two articulated quadrilaterals

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Data Source

PatentEP1741860B1Snap hinge for supporting a closure element
Publication Date: 2009.08.19 ZETTI DANIELE
  • EP1741860B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP1741860B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP1741860B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A snap hinge for supporting a closure element, which comprises a first articulated quadrilateral (2) and a second articulated quadrilateral (3), which share a first lever (4) and a second lever (5), which have as their base element respectively a plate (6) for coupling to a fixed element (7) and a plate (8) for fixing to a closure element (9), an elastic element (12) acting between a point of the first lever (4) and a point of the second lever (5), and an auxiliary elastic element (13), arranged in series to the elastic element (12) and has one end articulated to the first lever (4) and the opposite end articulated to an abutment element (14) rigidly associated with the coupling plate (6).