Snap-in Closure Tab Design for Strong Locking Force

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing snap-in closure containers have a weak locking force, making them unsuitable for storing heavy objects while maintaining low manufacturing costs and ease of operation.

Innovation Solution

A snap-in closure system with a detachable tab from the container wall, featuring a snap-in key and slit design that generates high spring force through material selection and detachment length, allowing for strong holding forces with minimal opening effort.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a snap-in closure is constructed as knob closure, then it is easy to open, but the holding or locking force is very weak

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of openingVSAvoidholding force
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The closure is divided into separate functional elements: a snap-in tab detached from the container wall, a snap-in key on the tab, and a corresponding snap-in slit in the opposite part. This segmentation allows each element to perform its specific function optimally - the detached tab provides spring action for easy opening while the sharp-edged surfaces provide strong locking force when engaged.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the geometric parameters of the snap-in surfaces by using sharp edges instead of rounded surfaces. The sharp-edged surfaces of the snap-in tab engage with the coordinated snap-in slit to generate high snap-in forces, while the detachment length of the tab determines the spring force magnitude. This allows the closure to achieve both strong holding force and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Force

If the snap-in tab is detached from the wall, then high spring force is generated, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespring forceVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The snap-in tab is created by detaching it from the container wall, separating the tab from the main body. This segmentation allows the tab to move independently and generate spring force through its detachment length, while the manufacturing process remains relatively simple using standard molding techniques with appropriate parting lines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The detached snap-in tab serves itself by utilizing its own detachment from the wall to generate the necessary spring force. The tab's position and detachment length automatically provide the spring action needed for operation, eliminating the need for additional springs or complex mechanical assemblies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Force

If sharp-edged surfaces are used for snap-in engagement, then high snap-in force is generated, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesnap-in forceVSAvoidsurface edge precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the geometric parameter of the engagement surfaces from rounded to sharp edges. This parameter change significantly increases the snap-in force generation capability. The sharp edges create concentrated contact points that generate higher forces, and the detachment length of the tab can be adjusted to control the spring force magnitude.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The sharp edges are applied locally at the critical engagement surfaces of the snap-in tab and corresponding slit. This localized application of sharp geometry provides the necessary high snap-in force exactly where needed, while the rest of the components can be manufactured with standard precision requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a container with a strong locking force capable of withstanding heavy objects while maintaining low manufacturing costs and ease of operation, ensuring secure closure and easy opening.

Implementation Method 1

A substantially high spring force is generated by the snap-in tab since normally containers of this type have a wall thickness of about 0.5 to 2.0 mm and very high closure forces can be generated with the selection of a suitable synthetic material.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring force: Spring

Implementation Method 2

The detachment of the snap-in tab from the wall of one container part provides a good spring action that can be effected for the snap-in tab.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS7681755B2Container with snap-in closure
Publication Date: 2010.03.23 ROESLER PETER
  • US7681755B2 patent drawing
  • US7681755B2 patent drawing
  • US7681755B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A container comprising a snap-in closure disposed between an upper part and a lower part of the container, the snap-in closure having a relatively strong holding or locking force and able to be opened relatively easily. The snap-in closure comprises a snap-in tab constructed out of the wall of one part of the container and detached along three sides, with a snap-in key disposed at the upper free end of the said snap-in closure and able to engage in a coordinated snap-in slit at the opposite container part.