Snapback Select Transistor Circuit for Compact Antifuse Programming

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Antifuse programming in integrated circuits consumes significant real estate due to the large size of transistors required to handle soak current, and existing solutions like polysilicon fuses are limited in their ability to be programmed after encapsulation.

Innovation Solution

An antifuse circuit with a disconnect transistor and a select transistor that operates in snapback mode, allowing for efficient programming of antifuses with reduced transistor size and enabling programming after encapsulation by controlling voltage application.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional transistors are used to program antifuses, then the antifuse can be programmed, but the transistor size becomes large due to soak current requirements, consuming significant real estate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveantifuse programming capabilityVSAvoidtransistor size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The select transistor is designed to operate in snapback mode by adjusting its breakdown voltage parameter to be less than the program voltage. This parameter change enables the transistor to conduct high soak current during programming while maintaining a smaller physical size compared to conventional transistors operating in linear mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The transistor dynamically transitions between different operating states: normally off during standby, and into snapback mode during programming when the program voltage exceeds the breakdown voltage. This dynamic operation allows the same transistor to serve dual purposes with reduced size requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If polysilicon fuses are used, then the circuit can be reconfigured, but they must be spaced apart to avoid laser damage to adjacent fuses, occupying substantial area

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecircuit reconfiguration capabilityVSAvoidfuse bank area
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical laser-based fuse opening process with an electrical programming mechanism using voltage-induced snapback mode. This substitution eliminates the need for physical spacing between fusible elements, as electrical programming does not generate the thermal damage zone that laser beams create.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The select transistor acts as an intermediary between the program voltage source and the antifuse. It controls the application of high voltage to rupture the antifuse dielectric, enabling precise electrical programming without affecting adjacent antifuses, thus allowing dense packing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If polysilicon fuses are used, then the circuit can be reconfigured, but they cannot be opened after encapsulation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepost-fabrication reconfigurationVSAvoidtime to detect and repair defects
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical laser opening process with electrical programming that can be performed through package pins. This substitution enables post-encapsulation programming by applying program voltage through external connections, eliminating the requirement for pre-encapsulation programming.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Productivity

If generic integrated circuits are configured after fabrication, then production yield improves, but the configuration process takes time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction yieldVSAvoidconfiguration time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the slow mechanical laser programming process with fast electrical programming through snapback mode transistors. The electrical method can be performed rapidly through package pins, significantly reducing the time required for post-fabrication configuration while maintaining the ability to improve production yield through generic circuit customization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution reduces the real estate consumption by enabling snapback mode operation in select transistors, allowing for effective programming of antifuses with smaller transistors and enabling post-encapsulation configuration, thereby improving production yield and reducing delays in meeting customer specifications.

Implementation Method 1

The select transistor operates in a snapback mode of operation in response to an assertion of the first select signal and the program voltage at the terminal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAvalanche breakdown: Avalanche Breakdown

Implementation Method 2

The application of the program voltage ruptures the dielectric of the antifuse 110, creating a conductive path through the transistors 115, 120

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDielectric breakdown: Avalanche Breakdown

Data Source

PatentUS7915916B2Antifuse programming circuit with snapback select transistor
Publication Date: 2011.03.29 MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US7915916B2 patent drawing
  • US7915916B2 patent drawing
  • US7915916B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An antifuse circuit includes a terminal, an antifuse, and a select transistor. The antifuse is coupled to the terminal and has an associated program voltage. The select transistor is coupled to the antifuse and has a gate terminal coupled to receive a first select signal. The select transistor operates in a snapback mode of operation in response to an assertion of the first select signal and the program voltage at the terminal.