Snapshot-Based Anomaly Detection for False Alert Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing data management systems struggle to accurately distinguish between malicious and non-malicious activities in computing systems, leading to false positives during anomaly detection, particularly in large-scale changes such as those caused by ransomware attacks or system upgrades.

Innovation Solution

A data management system (DMS) captures snapshots and maintains metadata to identify changes, using thresholds for system-file-count and system-file-byte ratios to differentiate between malicious and non-malicious activities by analyzing file paths and directory names, thereby reducing false alerts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a data management system monitors file changes to detect malicious activities, then the ability to identify ransomware attacks is improved, but false positives increase due to non-malicious activities like system upgrades

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of malicious activity detectionVSAvoidfalse positive alerts
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the file change monitoring process into multiple analysis dimensions: (1) basic file change detection, (2) file path pattern analysis to identify system files, (3) ratio calculation between system files and total files deleted, and (4) threshold-based classification. This segmentation allows the system to distinguish between malicious and non-malicious activities by examining different aspects of file changes separately and comprehensively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces quantitative parameters to characterize file changes: the ratio of system files deleted to total files deleted, and the ratio of system file bytes deleted to total bytes deleted. By calculating these parameters and comparing them against predefined thresholds, the system transforms qualitative anomaly detection into quantitative analysis, enabling more accurate discrimination between ransomware attacks and legitimate system operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the system alerts on all large-scale file deletions, then malicious activities are detected, but user experience deteriorates due to excessive false alerts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection of anomalous activityVSAvoiduser experience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs threshold-based parameter comparison to control alert generation. By calculating the ratio of system files deleted to total files deleted and comparing it against a predefined threshold, the system intelligently determines whether to generate an alert. This parameter-driven approach ensures that alerts are only generated when the pattern matches malicious behavior, eliminating false alerts caused by system upgrades and improving user experience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where the analysis results (ratio calculations) feed back into the alert decision process. The calculated ratios are compared against thresholds to determine alert generation, creating a closed-loop system that continuously refines detection accuracy based on observed patterns, thereby reducing false positives while maintaining reliable malicious activity detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12536139B2Anomaly detection for computing systems
Publication Date: 2026.01.27 RUBRIK INC
  • US12536139B2 patent drawing
  • US12536139B2 patent drawing
  • US12536139B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and devices for data management are described. A data system may capture a first snapshot of a target computing system at a first time, and a second snapshot at a second time that is later than the first time. The system may compare the second snapshot with the first snapshot to identify whether a set of deleted files includes a quantity of deleted files that satisfies a file deletion threshold. Using metadata associated with the target computing system, the system may identify a subset of the set of deleted files as corresponding to one or more system files. The DMS may then determine whether a ratio between a first value of a deletion metric and a second value of the deletion metric satisfies a threshold ratio. In some examples, the system may refrain from generating an alert based on the ratios satisfying the threshold ratio.