SNP Selection for Nucleic Acid Probe Array Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for genome-wide association studies face challenges in selecting and designing nucleic acid probe arrays that efficiently identify and genotype single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across the human genome, due to the complexity and vastness of genomic data, which hinders the diagnosis and treatment of diseases like cancer and mental illness.

Innovation Solution

The development of computer-implemented methods for selecting relevant SNPs with high information content, using specific restriction enzymes like Sty I and Nsp I, and designing nucleic acid probe arrays with optimized probe sets to efficiently genotype SNPs, ensuring accurate and reproducible results.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If genome-wide association studies use comprehensive SNP selection methods, then the accuracy of disease diagnosis and treatment is improved, but the complexity of genomic data analysis increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of disease diagnosisVSAvoidcomplexity of genomic data analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the genomic data analysis process into multiple stages: initial SNP selection based on information content, conversion to probe sets, screening for performance criteria, and final selection for array design. This segmentation allows systematic management of complexity while maintaining comprehensive analysis capability for improved diagnostic accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and filters SNPs based on specific criteria (information content, minor allele frequency, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium) to identify the most relevant markers for disease association studies. This extraction process reduces the complexity of analyzing all genomic data while preserving the most informative SNPs for accurate disease diagnosis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Loss of information

If nucleic acid probe arrays are designed with comprehensive probe sets, then the coverage of genomic information is improved, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage of genomic informationVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity of probe arrays
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by selecting only the most informative SNPs and converting them to a reduced set of probe quartets rather than creating comprehensive probe sets for all possible SNPs. This approach maintains adequate genomic coverage while significantly reducing manufacturing complexity and array design burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes parameters such as reducing the number of probes per SNP from comprehensive coverage to optimized probe quartets (typically 4-8 probes), and adjusting the selection criteria for SNPs based on information content and statistical criteria. These parameter changes enable manageable manufacturing while preserving essential genomic information coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If SNP selection criteria are made more stringent, then the quality of genotyping results is improved, but the number of selectable SNPs decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of genotyping resultsVSAvoidnumber of selectable SNPs
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms through iterative screening processes where probe sets are evaluated against performance criteria (call rate, accuracy, heterozygosity) and SNPs are selectively retained or discarded. This feedback loop ensures high-quality genotyping results while maintaining an adequate number of selectable SNPs through data-driven optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates composite selection criteria that combine multiple factors (information content, minor allele frequency thresholds, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium p-values, call rate requirements) to evaluate SNPs holistically. This composite approach allows stringent quality control while preserving sufficient SNPs by considering the combined impact of multiple criteria rather than applying single-criterion filters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS7881875B2Methods for selecting a collection of single nucleotide polymorphisms
Publication Date: 2011.02.01 AFFYMETRIX INC
  • US7881875B2 patent drawing
  • US7881875B2 patent drawing
  • US7881875B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to the selection of a collection of relevant single nucleotide polymorphisms across a genome to design a nucleic acid probe array. As such, the invention relates to diverse fields impacted by the nature of genetics, including biology, medicine, and medical diagnostics.