SO3 Chromatography for Influenza Virus Purification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for purifying influenza virus are inefficient in achieving high yield and purity, particularly for vaccine production, and do not effectively preserve the virus's immunogenicity and infectivity.

Innovation Solution

A process involving centrifugation, nuclease treatment, low conductivity buffer dilution, SO3 chromatography, and washing steps is employed to purify influenza virus, using monolithic columns and specific buffers to maintain virus integrity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional purification methods (ultra-filtration, ultra-centrifugation) are used, then virus concentration is achieved, but purity is insufficient and host cell contaminants remain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevirus purityVSAvoidpurification efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the conductivity parameter of the buffer from conventional levels to low conductivity (≤5 mS/cm), which fundamentally alters the chromatographic separation mechanism. This parameter change enables the SO3 chromatography to achieve both high purity (99% removal of host cell proteins and DNA) and high productivity in a single step, resolving the contradiction between purification precision and efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a composite approach by combining SO3 functionalized chromatography support with low conductivity buffer conditions. This composite system creates a unique purification environment that simultaneously achieves high virus binding capacity and high purity, overcoming the limitations of traditional single-method approaches

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Manufacturing precision

If conventional chromatography is used, then some purification is achieved, but virus binding capacity is low and requires large column volumes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepurification effectivenessVSAvoidcolumn volume required
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

By changing the conductivity parameter to low levels (≤5 mS/cm) and using SO3 functionalization, the patent achieves a 30-fold increase in virus binding capacity. This allows the use of much smaller column volumes (e.g., 5 mL column for 500 mL virus sample) while maintaining high purification effectiveness, directly resolving the contradiction between purification effectiveness and quantity of material required

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If strong purification methods are used to achieve high purity, then contaminants are removed, but virus infectivity and immunogenicity are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevirus purityVSAvoidvirus infectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The low conductivity buffer acts as an intermediary that enables gentle chromatographic conditions. It allows the SO3 chromatography to achieve 99% removal of host cell proteins and DNA while maintaining virus infectivity and immunogenicity, because the low ionic strength prevents harsh interactions that would damage the virus particles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the conductivity parameter to low levels, which fundamentally alters the chromatography mechanism to be gentler on the virus. This parameter change enables achieving high purity through enhanced selectivity rather than harsh conditions, thus preserving virus reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method achieves high-purity, immunogenic, and infective influenza virus recovery, with up to 99% removal of host cell proteins and DNA, and a 30-fold increase in virus binding capacity compared to previous methods.

Implementation Method 1

subjecting said diluted fraction to a SO3 chromatography step

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon exchange: Ion Exchange

Implementation Method 2

incubating said fraction with a nuclease

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnzyme catalysis: Enzyme

Implementation Method 3

subjecting the cell culture to centrifugation to get a supernatant fraction of virus particles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal separation: Centrifugal Separation

Data Source

PatentEP3707250B1So3 chromatography for use in a method for virus purification
Publication Date: 2026.03.18 BLUESKY IMMUNOTHERAPIES GMBH
  • EP3707250B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP3707250B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP3707250B1 patent drawingFigure 2A

AI summary

The present invention refers to a process for purifying virus particles from cell culture, comprising the steps of subjecting the cell culture to centrifugation to get a supernatant fraction of virus particles, incubating said fraction with a nuclease, diluting the fraction with low conductivity buffer, subjecting said diluted fraction to a SO3 chromatography step, performing a washing step with low conductivity buffer, and eluting virus particles.