SOAR Cyber Response for Physically Controlled Distributed Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Physically controlled distributed systems (PCDS) face operational challenges due to cyber connections that serve as attack vectors, making them vulnerable to unauthorized access and adverse effects, with existing intrusion detection and mitigation systems being inadequate in response times and effectiveness.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR) system that integrates with Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) to autonomously detect and respond to cyber threats, using a combination of signature and behavior-based analysis to quickly neutralize attacks and revert systems to a known good state.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If traditional intrusion detection systems are used to monitor PCDS, then detection capability is provided, but response time is too slow (averaging weeks)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidintrusion mitigation effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-configuring automated response playbooks and security policies before attacks occur. When threats are detected, pre-programmed responses are immediately executed, eliminating the weeks-long delay of manual intervention and enabling response times measured in seconds or minutes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The security system serves itself through automated orchestration that detects threats, analyzes them against threat intelligence, and executes mitigation actions without human intervention. This self-service capability transforms security operations from manual processes to autonomous systems that respond instantly to threats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If cyber connections are added to PCDS for control and monitoring, then operational capability is improved, but vulnerability to attacks increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol and monitoring capabilityVSAvoidattack vectors
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces security orchestration as an intermediary layer between cyber connections and PCDS operations. This intermediary monitors all network traffic, filters malicious content, and mediates legitimate communications, allowing operational capabilities to function while blocking attack vectors at the network layer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where threat intelligence from multiple sources is constantly analyzed, and security policies are dynamically adjusted based on detected threats. This feedback mechanism enables the system to adapt to new attack methods while maintaining operational connectivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If automated SOAR playbooks are implemented, then response speed is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat response speedVSAvoidsecurity system architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The security orchestration platform provides multi-functionality by consolidating threat detection, analysis, response automation, and intelligence gathering into a single unified system. This universal platform handles multiple security functions simultaneously, improving response speed while avoiding the complexity of multiple separate systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges previously separate security functions (intrusion detection, threat intelligence, automated response, and incident management) into an integrated SOAR platform. This consolidation streamlines operations and improves response speed while managing complexity through unified architecture rather than multiple discrete systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12470594B1Systems and methods for blocking, detecting and responding to cyber attacks in physically controlled distributed systems
Publication Date: 2025.11.11 NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS OF SANDIA LLC
  • US12470594B1 patent drawing
  • US12470594B1 patent drawing
  • US12470594B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods that provide Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR) technologies that equip cyber-defenders with new capabilities to autonomously respond to network and host-based system alerts, threat hunting results, and cyber intelligence data streams. Systems and methods provide a novel SOAR approach for networked systems where such networked systems include PCDS systems such as DERs. System may ingest data from multiple Intrusion Detection Systems (IDSs) to quickly block attacks and revert PCDS systems to known good states via a collection of IDS technologies including Bump-in-the-Wire (BITW) devices which incorporate physical and cyber data to detect abnormal and potential malicious behaviors.