SoC Resource Protection via State Machine Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing System-on-Chip (SoC) technologies face challenges in ensuring safe and secure access and control of resources, as secure software may not be safe, and safe software may be malicious, leading to compromised security and safety when shared resources are accessed by different hardware and software entities.

Innovation Solution

A dual-level protection mechanism using a state machine that restricts state transitions based on the identity of bus masters, ensuring that only authorized safe or secure bus masters can modify resource configurations, with a secure master checking configurations to prevent malicious changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If shared resources are accessible by both secure and non-secure bus masters, then resource utilization and functionality are improved, but security and safety risks increase due to potential malicious access

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource accessibilityVSAvoidsecurity and safety risks
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments resource access control into two distinct levels: a first level controlling which bus masters can change resource protection configuration, and a second level controlling interactions between safe and secure bus masters with the resource itself. This segmentation allows different access policies for different operational needs, enabling both secure and non-secure masters to access resources while maintaining security through differentiated control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a state machine as an intermediary between bus masters and resources. The state machine mediates all access requests, transitioning between states based on the identity and authorization of the bus master. This intermediary enforces security policies by allowing only authorized masters to perform specific state transitions, thus enabling resource sharing while preventing unauthorized or malicious access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If a single protection level is used for resource access, then device complexity is reduced, but security and safety protection is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity and safety protectionVSAvoidprotection mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides protection into two distinct levels: the first level controls which bus masters can modify resource protection configuration, while the second level controls interactions between safe and secure bus masters with the resource. This segmentation enables targeted security measures at each level, providing comprehensive protection without requiring a single complex monolithic protection mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds a temporal dimension to protection by introducing state transitions. The state machine moves through different states (e.g., configuration state, operational state, secure state), and different bus masters are authorized for different transitions. This dimensional approach to protection allows the system to enforce security policies dynamically based on the current state, enhancing security without requiring static complex protection for all operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Adaptability or versatility

If resource configuration can be changed dynamically, then adaptability is improved, but security risks increase due to potential malicious configuration changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration flexibilityVSAvoidmalicious configuration changes
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary authorization checks before allowing configuration changes. The state machine verifies the identity and authorization of the bus master attempting to change resource configuration before permitting the transition. This preliminary verification ensures that only authorized masters can modify configurations, preventing malicious changes while maintaining the ability to dynamically reconfigure resources when authorized.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The state machine provides feedback mechanisms by monitoring and responding to access requests. When a bus master attempts to change resource configuration, the state machine evaluates the request against stored authorization rules and either permits or denies the transition. This feedback loop ensures that configuration changes are controlled and logged, enabling adaptability while preventing unauthorized modifications through continuous monitoring and enforcement of security policies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11288404B2Resource protection
Publication Date: 2022.03.29 INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG
  • US11288404B2 patent drawing
  • US11288404B2 patent drawing
  • US11288404B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A System on Chip (SoC), including a plurality of processor cores including a secure master, which is configured to run security software, and a non-secure master, which is configured to run non-security software; a resource configured to be shared by the secure master and the non-secure master; and a state machine configured to protect the resource by allowing only the secure master to transition the resource to a particular state of the state machine, and allowing only the non-secure master to transition the resource to another particular state of the state machine.