SoC Secure Environment Without MMU Using Sealed Non-Volatile Memory

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Deeply embedded systems lack a secure environment for hypervisor execution without Memory Management Units (MMUs) and virtual memory, necessitating a solution for secure isolation and protection of intellectual property and resources.

Innovation Solution

A secure environment is established using embedded non-volatile memory to configure security parameters, which are sealed to prevent access by the processor, and a lightweight security hypervisor scheme is implemented to create two virtual environments for separating trusted and untrusted code, with specific use models like sandbox, secure services, and pure isolation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional security mechanisms (supervisor vs user mode, MPU) are used, then basic protection is provided, but true isolation and separation are not achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity isolationVSAvoidvirtualization capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into distinct secure and non-secure worlds with separate execution environments. The secure world contains protected code and data in dedicated memory regions, while the non-secure world runs application code. This segmentation achieves true isolation without requiring full virtualization complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a new dimension of security by implementing a dual-world execution model that operates alongside the traditional supervisor/user mode. This adds a layer of isolation in the security domain without fundamentally changing the existing processor architecture, avoiding the complexity of full virtualization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If two separate processors are used for security and normal operations, then isolation is achieved, but cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity isolationVSAvoidprocessor configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges security functionality into a single processor by implementing secure and non-secure worlds within one CPU core. The processor can switch between worlds using security state machines and memory management units, eliminating the need for separate security and application processors while maintaining isolation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The single processor is designed to be universal by supporting multiple execution modes (secure world, non-secure world, supervisor mode, user mode). The same hardware resources are shared across different security contexts through controlled access mechanisms, reducing the need for dedicated hardware for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If MMU and virtual memory are implemented for secure hypervisor execution, then security isolation is improved, but device cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecure environmentVSAvoidmemory management unit
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential security isolation functionality from the full MMU/virtual memory system. Instead of implementing complete virtual memory management, the system uses a simplified memory protection mechanism that provides only the necessary isolation for secure code execution, removing unnecessary complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The memory protection mechanism is applied locally to specific secure memory regions rather than implementing global virtual memory management. The MPU is configured to protect only the critical secure code and data segments, providing targeted security without the overhead of system-wide virtualization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Adaptability or versatility

If supervisor vs user mode or MPU is used for security, then basic protection is provided, but resource sharing and virtualized environment are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource sharingVSAvoidsecurity protection
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a secure monitor as an intermediary layer between the secure and non-secure worlds. This mediator manages resource sharing by controlling access to shared peripherals and memory, enabling versatile resource utilization while maintaining security through enforced access policies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS8843769B2Microcontroller with embedded secure feature
Publication Date: 2014.09.23 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
  • US8843769B2 patent drawing
  • US8843769B2 patent drawing
  • US8843769B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A secure environment is established within a system on a chip (SoC) without the use of a memory management unit. A set of security parameters is produced by a configuration program executed by a processor within the SoC that is read from a first non-volatile memory within the SoC. A set of stored parameters is created in a committable non-volatile memory within the SoC by writing the set of security parameters into the committable non-volatile memory. The committable non-volatile memory is sealed so that that it cannot be read or written by the processor after being sealed. The stored parameters can then be accessed only by control circuitry. Security circuitry within the SoC is configured using the stored parameters each time the SoC is initialized and thereby enforces the secure environment within the SoC.