Social Annotation Boosting Ad Relevance and Click-Through Rates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Internet-based advertising, particularly banner ads, often fail to resonate with users as they are not tailored to individual interests, leading to low click-through rates and missed opportunities for both users and advertisers.

Innovation Solution

A method that utilizes location tags from a user's social network contacts to annotate ads, enhancing their relevance by indicating which contacts have checked in or tagged locations associated with the ad, thereby increasing the ad's score and appeal to the user.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If banner ads are displayed to webpage visitors, then advertising coverage is achieved, but ad relevance to users deteriorates leading to low click-through rates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadvertising coverageVSAvoidad relevance
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by customizing ad content based on user-specific attributes (location, interests, demographics) rather than using uniform ads for all users. The system tailors ad messages to match individual user profiles, making each ad relevant to its specific target audience while maintaining broad advertising coverage across different user segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary action by collecting and analyzing user data (location tags from social networks, browsing history, demographic information) before ad delivery. This pre-processing of user information allows the system to pre-segment audiences and pre-select appropriate ads, ensuring relevance is established before the ad is actually displayed to the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Quantity of substance

If generic ads are used for broad coverage, then advertising reach is improved, but user engagement deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadvertising reachVSAvoiduser engagement
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making ad selection adaptive and dynamic rather than static. The system continuously updates user profiles based on new location tags and browsing behavior, dynamically adjusting which ads are served to which users. This dynamic approach allows the system to maintain broad reach while continuously optimizing for user engagement based on real-time data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes by varying ad content parameters (message, imagery, call-to-action) based on user attributes. The system changes ad parameters to match user location, interests, and demographic characteristics, transforming generic ads into personalized messages that maintain broad coverage while significantly improving engagement through relevance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If ads are tailored to user interests, then ad relevance is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvead relevanceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies self-service by having users voluntarily contribute data (location tags, social network connections, browsing preferences) that automatically feeds into the ad targeting system. This user-generated data reduces the complexity of data collection for the system, as users essentially serve their own profiling needs by sharing information they choose to make public on social platforms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses social network data as an intermediary layer between users and ads. Instead of directly analyzing complex user behavior patterns, the system leverages pre-processed social network information (friends' location tags, checked-in places, shared interests) as a mediator to infer user preferences and deliver relevant ads, simplifying the matching process while maintaining high relevance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If social network data is collected for ad personalization, then ad appeal is improved, but data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvead appealVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-processing and storing social network data (location tags, checked-in places, user interests) in advance before ad delivery is needed. The system maintains pre-computed user profiles and social network graphs, allowing rapid ad selection without performing complex queries at the moment of ad delivery, thus reducing processing time while maintaining high appeal through personalized content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9558280B1Methods, apparatuses and computer-readable media for annotating ads with location tags
Publication Date: 2017.01.31 GOOGLE LLC
  • US9558280B1 patent drawing
  • US9558280B1 patent drawing
  • US9558280B1 patent drawing

AI summary

When a contact of a user tags a location, a posted comment, or a shared item, the location tag may be used to boost ad scores and/or annotate content such as advertisements. The location tag may be used to annotate ads to indicate that the contact has tagged a location associated with the ad. Persons other than contacts of the user may also tag and have their location tags be counted in annotations as well. Advertisers may specify locations that are associated with their ads. Location tags may be stored in a table, and used by an ads server to boost scores of ads that have been location tagged. An annotation server may also use location tags to construct annotations that are sent to a client device operated by the user. The annotations may be based on one or more location tags made by one or more users.