Real-Time Social Engineering Scam Detection via ML Pattern Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Social engineering scams pose a significant threat, costing individuals and businesses billions of dollars annually, as they often target unsuspecting individuals, customer support professionals, and client managers through sophisticated impersonations.

Innovation Solution

The development of systems and methods that utilize machine learning engines to analyze communications in real-time, extract patterns, compare them to known scam patterns, and generate alerts when a match is found, along with determining risk scores based on user demographics and transaction types.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If real-time analysis of communications is performed using machine learning engines, then scam detection capability is improved, but computational resources and processing time are increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescam detection capabilityVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-processes communications during normal interactions to establish baseline voice signatures and behavioral patterns. This preliminary action allows the machine learning engine to perform lighter real-time comparison operations during actual scam detection, reducing computational load while maintaining high detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The analysis focuses on specific local characteristics of communications such as voice pitch, tone, rate of speech, and particular linguistic patterns rather than analyzing entire communications in full detail. This selective local analysis reduces computational resources while improving detection accuracy for scam indicators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If voice elements are extracted and compared to detect duress, then detection accuracy is improved, but processing complexity is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveduress detection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the most critical voice elements such as pitch variation, speech rate, and specific acoustic features that indicate duress, rather than analyzing all voice characteristics. This selective extraction maintains high detection accuracy while reducing processing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If risk scores are calculated based on multiple factors including demographics and transaction types, then prediction accuracy is improved, but data processing requirements are increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoiddata processing requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system transforms multiple data factors including demographics, transaction types, and communication patterns into a unified risk score parameter. This parameter transformation consolidates diverse data requirements into a single actionable metric, improving prediction accuracy while reducing the complexity of data processing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250086656A1Systems and methods for predicting and preventing social engineering scams in real time
Publication Date: 2025.03.13 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NA
  • US20250086656A1 patent drawing
  • US20250086656A1 patent drawing
  • US20250086656A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for predicting and preventing social engineering scams in real time are disclosed. According to one embodiment, a method for predicting social engineering scams in real time may include: (1) receiving, at a computer program executed by a user electronic device for a user, a communication; (2) extracting, by the computer program and using a machine learning engine, a pattern from the communication; (3) comparing, by the computer program, the pattern to scam patterns in a local scam database; (4) and generating, by the computer program, an alert in response to the pattern matching one of the scam patterns.