Social Entity Profile Scoring for Predictive Threat Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional cybersecurity approaches focus on reactive measures that are inadequate against evolving cyber threats, particularly those exploiting social media and networks, which require predictive and proactive security to identify and mitigate risks before attacks occur.

Innovation Solution

An active social risk defense engine paired with a predictive analysis framework uses a scoring algorithm to assess risks by analyzing characteristics of social entities, URLs, files, and communications, comparing scores to thresholds to initiate security actions, such as alerts or blockages, to protect individuals and organizations from social-based threats like impersonation, fraud, and social engineering.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional reactive security measures (anti-virus, firewalls) are used to secure endpoints and networks, then system security is maintained through perimeter defense, but the system cannot proactively identify dormant malicious entities before they initiate attacks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity effectivenessVSAvoidability to detect evolving threats
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by proactively scanning social networks to identify dormant malicious entities before they can initiate attacks. The predictive analysis framework continuously monitors and assesses potential threats in advance, generating risk scores and alerts before actual cyber-attacks occur, thus preventing harm rather than merely responding to it.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary predictive analysis framework that acts as a mediator between traditional reactive security systems and emerging social media-based threats. This framework analyzes social network data, entity characteristics, and behavioral patterns to generate predictive risk assessments, bridging the gap between conventional security measures and modern social engineering threats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If social media and networks are expanded for communication and information sharing, then connectivity and information access are improved, but information security risk increases due to targeted attacks, fraud, and impersonation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesocial connectivityVSAvoidinformation security risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system converts the harmful expansion of social media into a beneficial security mechanism by leveraging social network data and entity interactions as the basis for predictive threat detection. The same social connectivity that enables fraud and impersonation also provides the data footprint necessary for identifying and neutralizing malicious entities before they exploit these channels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical perimeter-based security defenses with an intelligent, data-driven predictive analysis system. Instead of relying on static firewalls and anti-virus signatures, the system uses machine learning algorithms and predictive modeling to dynamically assess and respond to social engineering threats, substituting mechanical security controls with adaptive intelligent analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If predictive analysis framework is implemented to identify dormant malicious entities, then security threats can be detected before attacks occur, but system complexity increases due to data collection and analysis requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredictive threat detectionVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The predictive analysis framework is segmented into distinct functional modules: data collection components that gather social network information, analysis components that assess entity characteristics and generate risk scores, and response components that initiate security actions. This segmentation allows the complex predictive system to be managed as manageable, independent modules rather than a monolithic complex system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Measurement precision

If profile scoring and comparison algorithms are used to identify imposters, then impersonation detection accuracy is improved, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimposter detection accuracyVSAvoidanalysis processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by focusing profile scoring and comparison algorithms only on entities that exhibit suspicious characteristics or fall into high-risk categories identified through preliminary filtering. Rather than exhaustively analyzing all social media entities, the system concentrates computational resources on partial subsets most likely to be malicious, achieving high detection accuracy without proportionally increasing processing time for the entire population.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9191411B2Protecting against suspect social entities
Publication Date: 2015.11.17 ZEROFOX INC
  • US9191411B2 patent drawing
  • US9191411B2 patent drawing
  • US9191411B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes identifying data on a social network that is associated with a suspect social entity, and determining one or more characteristics of the identified data. A reference to the identified data is generated for each of the one or more characteristics. One or more of the generated references are compared to one or more stored references, where the one or more stored references are associated with a protected social entity. A profile score for the suspect social entity is determined based on the comparison. Determining the profile score includes identifying a match between one or more of the generated references and one or more of the stored references.