Social Media Reputation Scoring via Implicit Evaluation Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Social media platforms face challenges in determining the reliability of information due to the proliferation of unreliable content, as existing methods primarily rely on explicit evaluations which are rarely made by users, and do not account for implicit evaluations from information consumers.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that calculate an evaluation score for information providers based on both explicit and implicit evaluations from information consumers, categorizing these evaluations to generate a reputation score that reflects the professionalism of the provider within specific categories, using equations to combine positive and negative implicit and explicit scores.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If social media services allow easy information production and rapid proliferation, then information accessibility and user engagement increase, but reliability of information decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation production speedVSAvoidinformation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where information consumers provide evaluations (likes, shares, comments, ratings) that are fed back to the information provider's reputation score. This continuous feedback loop allows the system to dynamically adjust reputation assessments based on user responses, thereby maintaining information reliability while preserving rapid information production and dissemination capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional manual verification mechanisms with an automated reputation scoring system that calculates reliability based on mathematical models incorporating multiple evaluation dimensions (explicit evaluations, implicit evaluations, consumer influence weights). This substitution enables automatic reliability assessment without slowing down information production or requiring manual review of each piece of content

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If social media services rely on explicit evaluations for reliability assessment, then evaluation accuracy may improve, but user participation decreases because explicit evaluations are rarely made

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation accuracyVSAvoidevaluation participation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces implicit evaluations as an intermediary mechanism that bridges the gap between user behavior and formal evaluation. By analyzing implicit actions (viewing duration, sharing behavior, commenting patterns) as mediators, the system captures evaluation data without requiring users to consciously perform explicit evaluation actions, thus maintaining both accuracy and participation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables the system to automatically extract evaluation signals from user behaviors without requiring users to actively participate in evaluation processes. The reputation scoring system self-services by monitoring and analyzing user interactions autonomously, converting passive viewing and engagement data into active reliability assessments without burdening users with additional evaluation tasks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10546034B2Method and system for evaluating reliability based on analysis of user activities on social medium
Publication Date: 2020.01.28 CHUNGBUK NAT UNIV IND ACADEMIC COOP FOUNDATION
  • US10546034B2 patent drawing
  • US10546034B2 patent drawing
  • US10546034B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are a method of evaluating reliability of information in a social media service includes calculating an evaluation score of information provided by an information provider on the basis of a social activity of each of a plurality of information consumers relating to the information, and calculating a reputation score of the information provider in a category of the information on the basis of the category and the evaluation score of the information.