Social Network Challenge Validation System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing technologies for interactive competition between individuals are limited in identifying and challenging opponents and determining winners, as they are constrained by predefined rules and environments, failing to provide users with the ability to engage in direct competition on their own terms.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for a social network website that allows users to challenge others based on their profiles, validating challenges by matching skill levels and publishing them on the website, with options for virtual or geographic locations, and includes voting mechanisms to determine winners, maintaining records of challenges, and allowing users to join categories and groups for competitions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If users are allowed to challenge any other user freely, then the ease of operation is improved, but the reliability of competition fairness deteriorates due to mismatched skill levels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of challenging usersVSAvoidfairness of competition
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary validation of challenges by checking skill level compatibility before allowing the challenge to proceed. The server validates whether the challenger and challengee have comparable skill levels, and only processes challenges that meet the fairness criteria, preventing unfair matchups before they occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The server acts as an intermediary between users by validating challenges and determining winner selection mechanisms. It mediates the competition process by ensuring skill level compatibility and selecting appropriate winner determination methods based on the challenge type and user profiles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the system validates challenges by matching skill levels, then the reliability of competition fairness is improved, but the device complexity increases due to additional validation requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefairness of competitionVSAvoidcomplexity of challenge validation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Users maintain their own skill level profiles, which are automatically updated based on their competition history and performance. The system leverages this self-maintained data structure to perform validation without requiring complex external verification processes, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining fairness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If winner selection is determined by user votes, then the adaptability of competition outcomes is improved, but the loss of time increases due to voting and counting processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility of winner determinationVSAvoidtime for winner selection
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically selects the winner determination method based on the challenge type, user preferences, and competition context. For some challenges, it uses automated objective criteria (such as performance metrics or predefined winning conditions), while for others it enables community voting. This dynamic approach allows the system to adapt to different situations and minimize time loss by using automated methods when possible.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20240320760A1Promoting competition between users of a social network
Publication Date: 2024.09.26 CALL-OUT LLC
  • US20240320760A1 patent drawing
  • US20240320760A1 patent drawing
  • US20240320760A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and computer program products for processing requests from a user system associated with a user profile in a database of a social network website. The process includes receiving a challenge that identifies a plurality of users and a task or activity which one user is challenging another user to perform. The challenge is forwarded to the person being challenged, and in response to receiving an acceptance of the challenge from the second user, the challenge is published on the social network website.