Social Network Effectiveness Scoring via Implicit Action Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for measuring the effectiveness of social networking activities only consider explicit actions, neglecting implicit actions and failing to provide a comprehensive indication of reach and engagement, making it difficult for businesses and individuals to assess the true impact of their social media efforts.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that calculates an effectiveness score by considering both explicit and implicit actions, determining the number of unique users performing each action, and weighing these actions to provide a ratio of activity score to the number of users exposed, offering a percentage-based effectiveness score that reflects engagement and reach.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If only explicit actions are counted to measure social networking effectiveness, then the measurement method is simple, but the measurement precision is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffectiveness measurement precisionVSAvoidmeasurement method complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments user actions into explicit actions (comments, shares, endorsements) and implicit actions (profile visits, content views, follow actions). This segmentation allows the system to capture both visible and hidden user interactions, thereby improving measurement precision without overwhelming complexity by organizing metrics into distinct categories that can be processed separately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary processing layer that tracks and correlates implicit actions with explicit actions. This intermediary mechanism captures hidden user interactions (such as profile visits and content views) and integrates them with visible actions, providing a more comprehensive effectiveness measurement while managing complexity through structured data processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If only explicit actions are considered, then the data collection process is straightforward, but the completeness of effectiveness assessment is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffectiveness assessment completenessVSAvoiduser action detection difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides user interactions into two segments: explicit actions that are easily detectable through standard social media APIs, and implicit actions that require additional tracking mechanisms. This segmentation enables the system to systematically collect both types of data, improving assessment completeness while managing detection complexity through organized data collection strategies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary tracking of implicit actions by setting up event listeners and tracking mechanisms before users interact with content. This preliminary action captures profile visits, content views, and follow actions as they occur, ensuring that when effectiveness assessment is performed, both explicit and implicit data are already collected and ready for analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If a comprehensive measure including implicit actions is implemented, then the effectiveness indication becomes more accurate, but the processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffectiveness score accuracyVSAvoidcalculation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by assigning different weights to different types of actions based on their significance. Explicit actions like shares and endorsements receive higher weights, while implicit actions like profile visits receive lower weights. This weighted approach improves effectiveness score accuracy by reflecting the varying importance of different user interactions, while managing processing complexity through a structured weighting system rather than treating all actions equally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of action weighting to reflect different levels of user engagement. By assigning numerical weights to various action types (e.g., higher weights for shares, lower weights for profile visits), the system accurately captures the relative impact of different interactions on effectiveness, while maintaining manageable complexity through consistent parameter application across all actions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If both explicit and implicit actions are tracked, then the reach and engagement metrics improve, but the data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereach and engagement measurement precisionVSAvoiddata processing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments data processing into separate streams for explicit and implicit actions. This allows the system to process each type of data using appropriate methods and priorities, improving reach and engagement measurement precision while maintaining data processing efficiency by avoiding the need to process all data uniformly through a single complex pipeline.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS9357022B1Measuring effectiveness of social networking activity
Publication Date: 2016.05.31 GOOGLE LLC
  • US9357022B1 patent drawing
  • US9357022B1 patent drawing
  • US9357022B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and machine-implemented method for providing effectiveness indications for social networking activity including receiving a request to provide an effectiveness score, identifying a plurality of actions performed with respect to the social networking activity by one or more other users exposed to the social networking activity, determining the total number of unique users performing the action, calculating an activity score for the social networking activity based on the determined number of users, determining a number of the users exposed to the social networking activity, calculating an effectiveness score for the social networking activity based on the total activity score and the number of users exposed to the social networking activity, wherein the effectiveness score comprises calculating the effectiveness score at least in part based on a ratio of the activity score to the number of the users exposed to the to the social networking activity.