Social Network Selection for Collaboration Artifacts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mechanisms for sharing information across social networks often result in an inefficient or incorrect set of cooperating users due to the lack of consideration for relationship strength between users and candidate social networks, leading to suboptimal collaboration outcomes.

Innovation Solution

A method that identifies users associated with collaboration artifacts and determines the relationship strength between these users and candidate social networks, using similarity metrics to select the most relevant networks for effective information sharing and collaboration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing mechanisms are used to share information across social networks, then information sharing occurs, but the set of cooperating users is minimized and/or incorrect due to lack of relationship strength evaluation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of cooperating user selectionVSAvoidcollaboration efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by evaluating relationship strength as a quantitative parameter between users and candidate social networks. The system calculates relationship strength metrics (such as interaction frequency, connection density, or engagement levels) and uses these parameters to filter and select the most relevant social networks for information sharing, thereby improving both the accuracy of user selection and collaboration efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/manual approach of selecting social networks for information sharing with an automated computational system. The system automatically calculates relationship strength between users and candidate networks, ranks the networks based on these metrics, and selects the optimal networks for sharing collaboration artifacts, eliminating the need for manual evaluation and improving both reliability and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If relationships are detected independently of relationship strength, then detection simplicity is maintained, but collaboration effectiveness is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection simplicityVSAvoidcollaboration effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically evaluating relationship strength and selecting appropriate social networks without requiring manual intervention. The computational system autonomously calculates metrics, compares candidate networks, and makes selection decisions, maintaining ease of operation while significantly improving collaboration effectiveness through data-driven relationship assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring relationship strength metrics and using this information to refine social network selections. The system evaluates the effectiveness of information sharing outcomes and adjusts its relationship strength calculations and network selections accordingly, improving collaboration effectiveness while maintaining operational simplicity through automated feedback loops.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10007706B2Identifying one or more relevant social networks for one or more collaboration artifacts
Publication Date: 2018.06.26 BEIJING ZITIAO NETWORK TECH CO LTD
  • US10007706B2 patent drawing
  • US10007706B2 patent drawing
  • US10007706B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, products, apparatus, and systems may provide for identifying a set of users associated with one or more collaboration artifacts. Additionally, a set of networks including a plurality of candidate social networks may be identified. Moreover, a relationship strength may be determined between the set of users associated with the one or more collaborations artifacts and each of the candidate social networks to identify one or more relevant social networks from the candidate social networks. Determining the relationship strength may include calculating a similarity metric. In addition, at least one member affiliated with the one or more relevant social networks may become aware of the collaboration artifact.