Social Network Topic Aggregation via Expert Curation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users face information overload and difficulty in determining the quality of search results, leading to a degraded user experience despite the use of search engines.

Innovation Solution

A system that aggregates content within a social network by identifying experts based on their skills and annotations, inviting them to curate and edit topic content, and dynamically revising it to improve relevance and quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If search engines return a large set of results to provide comprehensive information, then the quantity of information increases, but users experience information overload and difficulty in determining quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantity of informationVSAvoidease of determining quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces expert users as intermediaries between the search engine and ordinary users. These experts curate and annotate search results, adding quality indicators that help users evaluate information without having to manually assess each result themselves. This mediator layer resolves the contradiction by maintaining comprehensive result sets while providing quality guidance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where expert annotations and user interactions with curated content inform future result ranking and curation. This feedback mechanism continuously improves the quality signals provided to users, making it easier to identify high-quality information while maintaining comprehensive coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the system aggregates and curates content dynamically, then the quality and relevance of content improves, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of contentVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent leverages the expertise of user community members who voluntarily contribute to content curation and annotation. This self-service approach allows the system to maintain high content quality through distributed expert knowledge without requiring a large centralized curation team, thus managing system complexity while improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system design allows regular users to become expert curators through progressive engagement, making the curation capability universal rather than limited to a specialized group. This multi-functionality enables the same platform to serve both as an information aggregation system and a content curation system, improving quality without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If experts are invited to curate and edit topic content, then the relevance of content to users increases, but the time and resources required for curation increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelevance of contentVSAvoidtime for curation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements partial curation where experts focus their efforts on the most important or controversial topics rather than comprehensively curating all content. This selective approach maintains high relevance for critical topics while managing the time investment required from expert curators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary automated filtering and organization of content before presenting it to expert curators. This preliminary action reduces the scope of work required from experts by pre-processing content, thus maintaining high relevance while reducing the time burden on curators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9331973B1Aggregating content associated with topics in a social network
Publication Date: 2016.05.03 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US9331973B1 patent drawing
  • US9331973B1 patent drawing
  • US9331973B1 patent drawing

AI summary

In order to facilitate access to relevant information, a system may determine topics that are of interest based on skills of users in a social network of users and annotations associated with content in the social network. Then, the system may identify experts knowledgeable about the topics among the users in the social network. These experts may be invited to aggregate and edit the topic content. For a given topic, the system may provide, to a subset of the experts, documents with suggested topic content and presentation formats for the topics. Based on feedback from the subset of the experts (such as modifications to one or more of the documents and/or the presentation formats), the system may modify or revise the documents.