Social Recommendation Threads for Context-Aware Item Discovery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing merchant and auction sites lack effective methods for providing personalized and context-aware item recommendations based on user interactions and social network relationships, leading to suboptimal user experience and inefficient item discovery.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for social media-based recommendations that utilize user interactions, social network relationships, and machine learning algorithms to generate personalized item suggestions, incorporating user weights, location, and context to provide relevant item recommendations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional search functions and categories are used to help users find items, then users can browse items, but the system cannot provide personalized and context-aware recommendations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a social network as an intermediary layer between users and items. The system collects social relationship data (friends, followers, interactions) and uses this intermediary information to generate personalized recommendations, enabling adaptability without requiring direct complex analysis of every user's complete browsing history and preferences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The recommendation system segments user preferences into different dimensions: social relationships (friends, family, colleagues), interaction patterns (likes, shares, comments), and contextual data (location, time). This segmentation allows the system to handle complexity by processing information in manageable categories rather than as a monolithic data structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If the system collects and processes user interactions and social network relationships, then personalized recommendations can be generated, but data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecommendation accuracyVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing and storing social network data (user profiles, relationship graphs, interaction histories) in databases before generating recommendations. This pre-action allows the recommendation system to quickly query and aggregate relevant information without performing complex real-time analysis, thereby improving accuracy while managing processing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where user interactions with recommended items (acceptance, rejection, engagement) are fed back into the system to refine future recommendations. This feedback loop enables the system to learn from actual user behavior patterns, improving measurement precision while the feedback structure provides a systematic approach to managing data processing complexity through iterative optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If recommendations are based on past user behavior and social network data, then relevant item suggestions can be provided, but the system cannot easily adapt to new contexts and relationships

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecommendation relevanceVSAvoidcontext awareness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamics by making the recommendation system adaptable to changing social relationships and contexts. The system continuously updates user profiles and relationship graphs as new social interactions occur, allowing recommendations to dynamically reflect current user circumstances rather than relying solely on static historical data. This enables the system to maintain reliability while improving context awareness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters such as weightings and thresholds based on contextual factors. For example, the system may adjust the importance of different social relationships (friends vs. family) or modify recommendation criteria based on time of day, location, or event context. This parameter adjustment capability allows the system to maintain high relevance while adapting to new situations without requiring complete system redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20260017706A1Method, medium, and system for social media-based recommendations
Publication Date: 2026.01.15 EBAY INC
  • US20260017706A1 patent drawing
  • US20260017706A1 patent drawing
  • US20260017706A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A user may request a recommendation for an item from other users. Other users may respond to the request by recommending for or against items. Users may up-vote or down-vote the recommendations or responses of other users. The recommendations of the other users may be used to identify items and provide one or more recommendations to the requesting user. The original question and the responses may form a conversation thread. The recommendations may be inserted into the thread as responses, may be presented alongside the thread, or may be presented at the end of the thread. The recommendations may be based on one or more attributes of the user. The weight of the recommendations provided by other users may vary.