Sock Arch Support Assemblage Reducing Foot Strain

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing socks inadequately provide structural support to the arch, Achilles tendon, and ankle regions of the foot, leading to pain and strain, particularly for individuals with conditions like plantar fasciitis or flat feet, as they focus primarily on cushioning rather than structural reinforcement.

Innovation Solution

A sock design featuring one or more support assemblages with varying elasticity coefficients, including arch, Achilles, and ankle support assemblages, to provide additional structural support and stability to these critical foot regions, utilizing tuck-stitching for a denser weave and incorporating materials like padded inserts or silicon for enhanced stiffness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If cushioning materials are used throughout the sock, then comfort is improved, but structural support for the arch and ankle regions is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecomfortVSAvoidstructural support
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different material properties to different regions of the sock. Specifically, the arch region (from heel to toe along the inner side) and ankle region (around the ankle bone) use cushioning material with higher loft and lower density for comfort, while the toe region and midfoot use reinforcement material with lower loft and higher density for structural support. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction by providing comfort where needed without compromising structural integrity in load-bearing areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If reinforcement material is used in the arch region, then structural support is improved, but comfort and cushioning are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoidcomfort
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent strategically places reinforcement material only in specific regions (toe and midfoot) where structural support is most needed, while using cushioning material in the arch region where comfort is prioritized. The arch region's reinforcement comes from the structural design of the knit pattern itself rather than dense material, maintaining comfort while providing necessary support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The sock is divided into distinct functional zones with different material properties. The arch region is segmented as a separate zone from the toe and midfoot regions, allowing independent optimization of material characteristics for each zone's specific functional requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of manufacture

If uniform elasticity is used throughout the sock, then manufacturing is simplified, but regional support requirements are not met

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidregional support adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements region-specific elasticity characteristics by using different stitch patterns and material densities in different zones. The arch and ankle regions use more elastic cushioning material with relaxed knit patterns, while the toe and midfoot use less elastic reinforcement material with tighter knit patterns. This allows the sock to adapt to the specific biomechanical requirements of each foot region while remaining manufacturable through standard knitting techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The sock effectively reduces pain and strain in the arch region, reinforces proper foot curvature, and minimizes injuries associated with the Achilles tendon and ankle, offering improved comfort and support without compromising on comfort.

Implementation Method 1

the second elasticity coefficient is lower than the first elasticity coefficient

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

utilizing tuck-stitching for a denser weave

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS11576441B2Sock with support assemblage
Publication Date: 2023.02.14 SOKSYST
  • US11576441B2 patent drawing
  • US11576441B2 patent drawing
  • US11576441B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates generally to a sock having one or more support assemblages for providing structural support to one or more regions of the foot of the wearer. In some exemplary embodiments, a support assemblage may be an arch support assemblage that is adapted to cover an arch of the foot. In some exemplary embodiments, a support assemblage may be an Achilles support assemblage that is adapted to cover the Achilles tendon of the foot. In some exemplary embodiments, a support assemblage may be an ankle support assemblage that is adapted to cover a portion of the ankle of the foot. In some exemplary embodiments, the sock may comprise multiple support assemblages to provide structural support to different regions of the foot of the wearer. Typically, a support assemblage will have an elasticity coefficient that is lower than an elasticity coefficient of the other areas of the sock.