Socket Adaptor Retention Structure for Vibration-Safe Impact Sockets

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional socket adaptors that rely on magnets for retaining impact sockets on impact tools are prone to failure due to vibrations, leading to potential catastrophic injuries, deaths, or damages when the sockets dislodge and fall off during use.

Innovation Solution

The development of socket adaptors with robust interconnection designs, featuring tapered, chamfered, and angled inner and outer surfaces, and the use of keepers such as molded elastomeric retaining rings and cylindrical metal pins, which provide a secure retention mechanism between the socket adaptor, impact socket, and anvil, preventing the socket from falling off even if the adaptor is damaged.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If magnets are used to retain impact sockets on socket adaptors, then the retention mechanism is simple and easy to manufacture, but the reliability fails under vibration conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the magnetic retention system with a mechanical retention system using keepers (retainers) that physically lock the socket to the adaptor. This substitution eliminates the reliability issues of magnets under vibration while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through standard mechanical fastening components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates retainers and retention features that are pre-designed to prevent socket dislodgement before vibration-induced failure can occur. The mechanical retention system is engineered to withstand anticipated vibration forces, providing proactive protection rather than reactive response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

2Device complexity

If conventional retainers are used without additional safety features, then the device complexity is low, but the safety and reliability under adverse conditions is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidsafety
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adds localized retention features (keepers, retention grooves, and engagement surfaces) at specific critical locations on the adaptor and socket interface. This approach enhances safety and reliability at key points without requiring complete redesign of the entire device, thus maintaining relatively low overall complexity while providing targeted safety improvements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11597062B2Socket adaptor
Publication Date: 2023.03.07 KRUPEY GARY RAYMOND
  • US11597062B2 patent drawing
  • US11597062B2 patent drawing
  • US11597062B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Exemplary embodiments are disclosed of socket adaptors for retaining impact sockets to impact tools.