SOCOACT Blockchain Voting System with Light Client Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current Bitcoin implementations lack features for secure, efficient, and transparent transaction processing, particularly in areas like voting systems, resource tracking, and microtransactions, due to high transaction costs and lack of centralized oversight.

Innovation Solution

The Crypto Voting and Social Aggregating, Fractionally Efficient Transfer Guidance, Conditional Triggered Transaction, Datastructures, Apparatuses, Methods and Systems (SOCOACT) utilize blockchain technology for secure, transparent, and efficient transactions by enabling fractional ownership, conditional voting, and microtransactions with reduced transaction costs through a centralized processing system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If Bitcoin uses decentralized peer-to-peer technology for transactions, then trustless anonymous network is achieved, but transaction costs are high and efficiency is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrustless anonymous networkVSAvoidtransaction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the transaction processing function by introducing light clients that can verify transactions without participating in the full consensus process. This allows the network to handle more transactions efficiently while maintaining security through distributed verification at multiple levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces full nodes as intermediaries that relay and verify transactions for light clients. This intermediary layer enables light clients to transact efficiently without directly participating in the computationally intensive consensus process, thereby improving overall transaction throughput while maintaining decentralized trust.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If Bitcoin implements complete transaction verification on all nodes, then security is maximized, but transaction costs increase and processing speed decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction securityVSAvoidtransaction processing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides node functionality into full nodes that perform complete verification and light clients that perform simplified verification. This segmentation allows the network to maintain high security through full nodes while reducing the energy and computational costs for the majority of users who only need basic transaction verification capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Light clients perform partial verification of transactions rather than complete verification. They verify essential security properties without duplicating the full consensus process, which significantly reduces computational costs while maintaining adequate security for their use cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If Bitcoin uses public-key cryptography for all transactions, then anonymity and security are achieved, but transaction size and processing overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecryptographic securityVSAvoidtransaction processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments cryptographic verification into different levels: full nodes perform complete cryptographic verification of all transactions, while light clients use simplified verification methods for their specific needs. This reduces the average computational complexity across the network while maintaining security where required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20170046689A1Crypto Voting and Social Aggregating, Fractionally Efficient Transfer Guidance, Conditional Triggered Transaction, Datastructures, Apparatuses, Methods and Systems
Publication Date: 2017.02.16 FMR CORP
  • US20170046689A1 patent drawing
  • US20170046689A1 patent drawing
  • US20170046689A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The Crypto Voting and Social Aggregating, Fractionally Efficient Transfer Guidance, Conditional Triggered Transaction, Datastructures, Apparatuses, Methods and Systems (“SOCOACT”) transforms vote request, vote input inputs via SOCOACT components into vote UI, vote confirmation outputs. A crypto vote request associated with a poll may be obtained from a user. Voter authentication may be obtained and used to determine that the user is authorized to vote. An authentication token and a crypto vote user interface may be generated and provided to the user. A crypto vote input that specifies a conditional vote that includes a set of vote conditions may be obtained from the user. Each vote condition is associated with a vote outcome and an aggregated blockchain oracle. The conditional vote may be instantiated in a socially aggregated blockchain datastructure. A determination that a vote condition has been satisfied may be made and the associated vote outcome may be determined.