Sodium-Ion Cathode Screening Using O3/P3 Stability Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The development of stable cathode materials for sodium-ion batteries is hindered by the need for extensive and costly experimental testing, as irreversible structural phase transitions during charging and discharging reduce battery capacity and stability.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning-based apparatus and method that selects candidate materials by generating O3 and P3 input data, classifying stability using predictive models, and performing data sampling to balance imbalances, ultimately identifying stable materials for cathode applications through an input data generation, material classification, data sampling, and selection unit configuration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If extensive experimental testing is performed to screen cathode materials, then reliable material selection is achieved, but time consumption and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial selection reliabilityVSAvoidmaterial screening time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary computational screening using density functional theory (DFT) calculations to evaluate structural stability, voltage profiles, and capacity before experimental testing. This preliminary action filters out unstable materials in advance, ensuring that only promising candidates proceed to experiments, thereby improving reliability while reducing time and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates computational models and simulations that replicate experimental conditions and outcomes. By using machine learning models trained on computational data to predict material performance, the system replaces extensive physical experiments with virtual copies, significantly reducing screening time while maintaining reliable material selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If comprehensive experimental screening is conducted to ensure material stability, then accurate stability assessment is achieved, but cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability assessment accuracyVSAvoiddevelopment cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary computational stability assessments using DFT calculations to determine structural stability, voltage profiles, and capacity before expensive experimental testing. This preliminary action identifies unstable materials early, preventing waste of resources on materials that would fail experimental testing, thereby improving assessment accuracy while reducing cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses computational models and machine learning predictions to replicate experimental stability assessments. By training models on computational data and using them to predict material stability, the system replaces costly physical experiments with computational copies, achieving accurate stability assessment at lower cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If traditional experimental methods are used for material exploration, then comprehensive material evaluation is achieved, but productivity decreases due to time-consuming processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial evaluation comprehensivenessVSAvoidmaterial development speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary computational evaluations of multiple materials in parallel using DFT calculations, assessing structural stability, voltage profiles, and capacity simultaneously. This preliminary action comprehensively evaluates many materials quickly, identifying promising candidates for further study and significantly accelerating material development compared to sequential experimental testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses machine learning models trained on computational data to predict material performance and replace extensive experimental testing. By creating virtual models that replicate comprehensive material evaluation, the system achieves thorough assessment at much higher productivity, enabling rapid identification of suitable cathode materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Reliability

If extensive experiments are performed to identify stable cathode materials, then reliable material selection is achieved, but the process becomes complex and resource-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecathode material selection reliabilityVSAvoidscreening process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary computational screening using automated DFT calculations to evaluate structural stability, voltage profiles, and capacity before experimental testing. This preliminary action establishes clear selection criteria and filters materials systematically, reducing the complexity of the overall screening process while maintaining reliable material selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses machine learning models to replicate and automate the material evaluation process. By training models on computational data and using them to predict material performance, the system replaces complex, manual experimental screening with automated computational workflows, reducing process complexity while maintaining selection reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces the time and cost of material screening, enhances the precision of cathode material selection, and identifies stable materials suitable for sodium-ion batteries without the need for separate experiments, improving the efficiency of sodium-ion battery development.

Implementation Method 1

a material classification unit configured to receive the O3 and P3 input data from the input data generation unit and classify the candidate materials depending on stability in a pristine state and desodiated state, respectively, by performing machine learning on data of the plurality of O3 and P3 structure materials using a pristine model and a desodiated model as prediction models

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMachine learning prediction:

Implementation Method 2

a data sampling unit configured to receive data from the material classification unit and perform data sampling to solve data imbalance between stable and unstable candidate materials in the pristine and desodiated states, respectively

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectData sampling:

Implementation Method 3

a selection unit configured to receive data from the data sampling unit and selecting a stable material maintaining stable structure during the charge and discharge of sodium-ion batteries among the candidate materials

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStructural stability:

Data Source

PatentUS20240355994A1Apparatus and method for selecting cathode material for sodium-ion battery using machine learning
Publication Date: 2024.10.24 FOUND OF SOONGSIL UNIV IND COOP
  • US20240355994A1 patent drawing
  • US20240355994A1 patent drawing
  • US20240355994A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus for selecting a sodium-ion battery cathode material using machine learning includes an input data generation unit configured to select candidate materials among a plurality of materials possible to be used as cathode materials for sodium-ion batteries and generate O3 input data and P3 input data respectively for O3 structure materials and P3 structure materials formed depending on structural transition during charge and discharge from each candidate material, and a material classification unit configured to receive the O3 and P3 input data from the input data generation unit and classify the candidate materials depending on stability in a pristine state and desodiated state, respectively, by performing machine learning on data of the plurality of O3 and P3 structure materials using a pristine model and a desodiated model as prediction models.