SOFC Anode Infiltration Sequence for Sulfur Poisoning Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) with Ni-based anodes are susceptible to sulfur poisoning and carbon-based degradation, and existing infiltration methods either compromise cell strength or are difficult to perform without causing cracking during stack fabrication.

Innovation Solution

Oxidize individual SOFCs before stacking, build the stack, reduce and then infiltrate the anodes with poison-preventing materials using vapor-phase or liquid solution permeation, eliminating the need for prior reduction/oxidation steps and maintaining cell strength.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the anode is reduced and then infiltrated prior to fabrication of the stack, then the anode becomes more robust to sulfur poisoning and carbon-based degradation, but the cell cracks during re-oxidation before stack fabrication

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobustness to sulfur poisoning and carbon-based degradationVSAvoidcell structural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the conventional sequence by performing infiltration after stack fabrication instead of before. The anodes are reduced and infiltrated while stacked, then the entire stack is re-oxidized. This inversion eliminates the cracking problem because the stack structure provides mechanical support during re-oxidation, preventing the cells from cracking despite the anodes being in a reduced state during infiltration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges multiple operations into a unified process. Instead of treating individual cells through separate reduction, infiltration, and re-oxidation cycles before stacking, the method combines these steps for the entire stack. The stack is reduced as a unit, infiltrated as a unit, and re-oxidized as a unit, which maintains structural integrity while achieving the desired anode protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Ease of manufacture

If the anode porosity is increased to allow infiltration, then the anode can be infiltrated with poison-preventing materials, but the strength of the anode is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinfiltration capabilityVSAvoidanode strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the oxidation state parameter of the anode rather than permanently altering its porosity structure. By cycling the anode through reduction (enabling infiltration) and re-oxidation (restoring strength), the method achieves infiltration capability without permanent loss of mechanical strength. The porosity remains sufficient for infiltration during the reduced state, but the anode regains full strength after re-oxidation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If the cell is kept reduced during stack fabrication, then infiltration can be performed, but air must be excluded which complicates the sealing process with sintered glass seals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinfiltration processVSAvoidstack fabrication complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary infiltration of the anodes while they are in the reduced state, before the re-oxidation step. This preliminary action completes the infiltration process while the anodes are still in the optimal chemical state for material uptake. After infiltration is complete, the stack is then re-oxidized in a controlled manner, allowing air to be introduced safely once the infiltration function has been achieved.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method effectively protects SOFC anodes from poisons without compromising cell strength, is cost-effective, and simplifies the manufacturing process, as demonstrated by improved power density and reduced degradation rates with specific material combinations like ruthenium and cerium.

Implementation Method 1

c) reduce all the stacked SOFC anodes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReduction: Reduction

Implementation Method 2

d) infiltrate all the stacked SOFC anodes with poison-preventing materials by either vapor-phase or liquid solution permeation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPermeation: Permeation

Implementation Method 3

a) oxidize all the individual SOFCs to be stacked before building a stack

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Data Source

PatentUS7833674B2Method for improving robustness of solid oxide fuel cell stacks
Publication Date: 2010.11.16 APTIV TECHNOLOGIES AG
  • US7833674B2 patent drawing
  • US7833674B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for forming a solid oxide fuel cell stack from a plurality of individual solid oxide fuel cells, wherein the anodes of the solid oxide fuel cells are infiltrated by one or more materials for making the anodes less sensitive to sulfur poisoning and/or less subject to carbon degradation and/or for improving the electrochemical performance of the stack, the method comprising the steps of oxidizing the anodes of the individual solid oxide fuel cells before forming a stack, building a solid oxide fuel cell stack with all of the anodes in an oxidized state, reducing all of the anodes, and then infiltrating all of the anodes with at least one of the materials.