Hybrid SOFC-PEM Fuel Cell Control for Microgrid Backup Loads

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electric energy generator systems face challenges in supporting variable loads efficiently, relying on non-generating storage systems like batteries or combustion type generators, which suffer from complexity, lack of flexibility, and emissions, and external grid reliance during failures.

Innovation Solution

A hybrid fuel cell system employing solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) for consistent base load and proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEM) for variable load demands, with a DC/DC converter and AC/DC inverter configuration to manage and adjust power output dynamically.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If non-generating storage systems like batteries are used to support variable loads, then load flexibility is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload flexibilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the fuel cell population into two distinct segments: SOFCs for base load and PEMFCs for variable load. This segmentation allows each fuel cell type to operate in its optimal performance regime, with SOFCs providing stable baseline power and PEMFCs responding dynamically to load changes, thereby achieving load flexibility without requiring complex external storage systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The hybrid fuel cell system performs multiple functions using a single integrated architecture: SOFCs handle base load power generation, PEMFCs provide variable load support, and the combination enables both load following and backup power capabilities. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate battery systems or external grid dependencies

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If combustion type generators are used to support variable loads, then power output flexibility is improved, but harmful emissions increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower output flexibilityVSAvoidemissions
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces combustion-type mechanical generators with electrochemical fuel cell technology. PEMFCs provide the necessary power output flexibility for variable loads through electrochemical reactions rather than combustion, eliminating harmful emissions while maintaining the ability to dynamically adjust power output according to load demands

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the fundamental operating parameters from combustion-based thermal processes to electrochemical reactions. This parameter change enables flexible power output adjustment through control of fuel supply and electrochemical reaction rates, achieving variable load support without the emissions associated with combustion processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If a single fuel cell type is used, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability to variable loads deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidload following capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the fuel cell population into two functional groups with distinct characteristics: SOFCs for stable base load and PEMFCs for dynamic variable load response. This segmentation achieves load following capability by leveraging the complementary strengths of each fuel cell type while maintaining relatively simple individual unit designs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a composite fuel cell architecture combining two different fuel cell technologies (SOFC and PEMFC) into a unified hybrid system. This composite approach enables adaptability to variable loads by integrating the high efficiency and stability of SOFCs with the rapid response capability of PEMFCs, achieving enhanced performance without excessive complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The hybrid system provides superior performance by efficiently supporting variable loads in grid-independent and grid-isolated situations, offering flexible load following and emergency backup with reduced emissions and improved efficiency compared to traditional systems.

Implementation Method 1

a first fuel cell of a first type (e.g., a solid oxide fuel cell) configured to output a base level direct current (DC) electric energy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFuel cell: Fuel Cell

Implementation Method 2

a second fuel cell of a second type different from the first type (e.g., a proton exchange membrane fuel cell) configured to output a variable level DC electric energy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFuel cell: Fuel Cell

Data Source

PatentEP4184625B1Hybrid fuel cell system for load following and backup in a microgrid and method of operating thereof
Publication Date: 2024.08.07 BLOOM ENERGY CORP
  • EP4184625B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4184625B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4184625B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method for operating a fuel cell system includes drawing a base level DC electric energy from a first fuel cell of a first type to a combined DC bus, measuring a DC voltage at the combined DC bus, determining whether the DC voltage at the combined DC bus falls short of a DC voltage threshold, and drawing a variable DC electric energy from a second fuel cell of a second type different from the first type in response to determining that the DC voltage at the combined DC bus falls short of the DC voltage threshold.