Soft-Decision Audio Decoding for Low-Latency Error Inference

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional wireless audio systems face challenges in maintaining audio continuity due to interference-induced errors, which result in increased latency and poor granularity in error detection, leading to undesirable audio dropouts or muting, especially in harsh RF environments.

Innovation Solution

A soft decision audio decoding system that generates hard and soft bits to determine the likelihood of errors in a digital signal, allowing for low-latency and high-granularity error inference, thereby maintaining audio continuity by decoding or muting the signal based on confidence levels in the received data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional error detection techniques (parity checking) are used to detect bit errors in digital signals, then error detection capability is provided, but latency increases and granularity is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection capabilityVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the error detection process by separating hard decision decoding (for latency-critical paths) from soft decision decoding (for accuracy-critical paths). Hard bits are processed immediately for low-latency applications, while soft bits provide enhanced error detection capability when available, resolving the contradiction between immediate error detection and reduced latency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary hard decision decoding to provide immediate error detection capability, then optionally performs soft decision decoding for enhanced accuracy. This preliminary action ensures that basic error detection occurs without the full latency overhead of soft decision techniques, while still providing the option for improved granularity when time permits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If conventional error detection techniques are used, then error detection is achieved, but granularity is poor and large amounts of data must be discarded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection capabilityVSAvoiddata discarding
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by providing different levels of error detection precision for different data segments or error conditions. Soft decision techniques provide fine-grained error identification for critical data portions, while hard decision techniques handle less critical data, allowing selective data retention based on local error characteristics rather than blanket data discarding

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of error detection precision by switching between hard decision (coarse granularity) and soft decision (fine granularity) modes. This parameter change allows the system to achieve high-granularity error detection when needed, identifying specific erroneous bits without discarding large amounts of valid data, thereby reducing information loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If data size is decreased to reduce latency and improve granularity, then latency and granularity improve, but more frequent parity calculations are needed increasing bandwidth cost

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovegranularityVSAvoidbandwidth consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a copy of the error detection approach by implementing both hard decision decoding (a simplified copy of full soft decision) and soft decision decoding. This copying allows the system to use the lower-bandwidth hard decision method for routine operations while reserving soft decision for cases requiring enhanced granularity, avoiding the need to always use high-bandwidth techniques

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Reliability

If parity checking is used for error detection, then error detection is provided, but audio continuity is disrupted causing dropouts or muting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection capabilityVSAvoidaudio continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful effect of detected errors (which would cause audio dropouts or muting) into a benefit by using soft decision techniques to identify and correct errors rather than simply detecting them. This conversion allows the system to maintain audio continuity by correcting errors in place, turning what would be harmful disruptions into opportunities for error recovery and continuous audio playback

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Data Source

PatentUS20240354052A1Soft Decision Audio Decoding System
Publication Date: 2024.10.24 SHURE ACQUISITION HLDG INC
  • US20240354052A1 patent drawing
  • US20240354052A1 patent drawing
  • US20240354052A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A soft decision audio decoding system for preserving audio continuity in a digital wireless audio receiver is provided that deduces the likelihood of errors in a received digital signal, based on generated hard bits and soft bits. The soft bits may be utilized by a soft audio decoder to determine whether the digital signal should be decoded or muted. The soft bits may be generated based on the detected point and a detected noise power, or by using a soft-output Viterbi algorithm. The value of the soft bits may indicate confidence in the strength of the hard bit generation. The soft decision audio decoding system may infer errors and decode perceptually acceptable audio without requiring error detection, as in conventional systems, as well as have low latency and improved granularity.