Soft Body Armor Apron Pockets for Upward Bullet Encapsulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current soft body armor panels fail to effectively encapsulate and prevent penetration of.357 Magnum, .44 Magnum, and 9 mm bullets at a 45-degree upward angle, leading to potential damage to the wearer's face, neck, and chest, due to stitching failure and bullet petaling, especially under laboratory conditioning.

Innovation Solution

The layers of the armor panel are folded over at the top edge to form pockets that capture upwardly directed bullets, with various configurations including single or multiple folded layers, nested or stacked arrangements, and extensions towards the bottom edge, enhancing the panel's ability to encapsulate and prevent penetration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If current multi-layer construction with perimeter stitching is used, then the panel structure is stable, but the panel fails to encapsulate bullets at 45-degree upward angles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebullet encapsulation capabilityVSAvoidpanel construction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the panel into distinct functional zones: a strike face layer for initial bullet impact, multiple intermediate layers for progressive energy absorption, and a backstop layer for final containment. This segmentation allows each layer to be optimized for specific ballistic functions, improving overall encapsulation capability without requiring uniform complexity throughout the entire panel structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a vertical dimension to bullet containment by arranging layers at different heights and angles. The strike face is positioned at a lower level than the backstop, creating a vertical path that forces bullets to traverse multiple layers at varying angles, thereby enhancing encapsulation of upwardly directed shots without simply adding more layers in a uniform horizontal stack.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Strength

If more layers are added to increase ballistic protection, then penetration resistance improves, but the panel weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveballistic penetration resistanceVSAvoidpanel weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different material densities and thicknesses to different regions of the panel. The strike face uses thinner, lighter material optimized for initial impact distribution, while the backstop uses denser, heavier material optimized for final bullet containment. This local quality variation achieves high ballistic protection without uniformly increasing panel weight across all layers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple material types with different ballistic properties in a single panel construction. Lighter materials are used in layers where impact distribution is critical, while heavier materials are placed where energy absorption and containment are most needed. This composite approach optimizes the weight-to-protection ratio by assigning specific materials to specific functional zones rather than using uniform material throughout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If traditional stitching methods are used to secure layers, then manufacturing is simple, but stitching fails under ballistic impact causing bullet escape

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelayer stabilization under impactVSAvoidstitching complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates preliminary reinforcement features during the manufacturing process, such as pre-positioned ballistic plates, pre-formed channel structures, and pre-stabilized layer arrangements. These preliminary actions create built-in stabilization mechanisms that prevent stitching failure under ballistic impact before the actual combat scenario occurs, eliminating the need for complex post-impact repairs or reinforcements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If perimeter stitching is used to stabilize layers, then the panel structure is maintained, but bullets can still penetrate and escape along the top edge

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebullet containment at top edgeVSAvoidedge stabilization structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a nested containment structure where multiple layers are arranged concentrically or in nested sequences, with each layer containing the previous one. This nesting creates multiple containment zones that progressively trap bullets, preventing escape along the top edge without requiring complex external stabilization structures. The nested arrangement naturally directs bullet paths inward and downward into the panel depth.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Data Source

PatentUS12372334B1Neck protecting soft body armor panel
Publication Date: 2025.07.29 BLAUER MANUFACTURING COMPANY INC
  • US12372334B1 patent drawing
  • US12372334B1 patent drawing
  • US12372334B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A soft body armor panel where one or more layers are folded over as an apron at the top edge forming a pocket(s) centered on the top edge that captures a bullet directed upwardly. The folded layers can take any number of different configurations. The folded layers can be stacked or nested. Normal layers can separate folded layers and/or be within pockets of folded layers. The apron can be 1-20 inches or extend the full height of the layer.